Price v. Ayers
Filing
224
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/8/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9
CURTIS FLOYD PRICE,
No. C 93-277 PJH
Petitioner,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Death Penalty Case
vs.
12
SCHEDULING ORDER
13
RON DAVIS, Acting Warden of San
Quentin State Prison
14
Respondent.
15
/
16
17
On November 24, 2014, the Court directed the parties to:
18
1.
Meet and confer to identify which claims they agree may be resolved based
19
on the record before the Court. Within fifteen (15) days of meeting and conferring, the
20
parties shall file a joint statement outlining a litigation schedule for briefing the merits of
21
record-based claims.
2.
22
If the parties determine that none of the claims are record-based, the parties
23
will set forth a schedule for addressing why the Supreme Court of California’s denial of
24
petitioner’s claims was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly
25
established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or
26
“resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in
27
light of the evidence presented in the State Court proceedings.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).
28
//
1
That order did not set a deadline for submission of the litigation schedule and the
2
parties have yet to submit a proposed schedule. The parties are hereby ORDERED to
3
submit their proposed litigation schedule within 30 days of the filing date of this order and in
4
accordance with the dictates of the November 24, 2014 order. If the parties fail to comply
5
with this order, the court will impose a litigation schedule without the input of the parties.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2015.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?