Price v. Ayers

Filing 226

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/18/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 CURTIS FLOYD PRICE, No. C 93-277 PJH Petitioner, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Death Penalty Case vs. 12 SCHEDULING ORDER 13 RON DAVIS, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison 14 Respondent. 15 / 16 17 The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint statement submitted on April 9, 2015. The 18 parties have identified 21 record-based claims that can proceed to briefing on the merits 19 without a request for an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner identified fourteen claims that he 20 believes warrant an evidentiary hearing and requested an opportunity to brief the basis for 21 such a hearing. The Court will first address the record-based claims and will take up 22 petitioner’s request to brief the need for an evidentiary hearing upon resolution of the 23 record-based claims. 24 In the interest of efficiency, and in order to avoid oversize briefs, the parties shall 25 divide the claims into three groups (by grouping together, for example, claims that have the 26 same factual predicates), and shall file three rounds of briefing, with each brief addressing 27 no more than seven claims. 28 Accordingly, by July 24, 2015, petitioner shall file his initial opening brief. The 1 response is due on or before August 24, 2015. The optional reply is due within fifteen days 2 of the date of service of the response. The parties are requested to observe a 30-page 3 limit for their briefs. A schedule for the second round of merits-based briefing will issue 4 upon resolution of the first round of briefed claims. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: May 18, 2015. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?