Hill v. Ayers

Filing 325

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 Michael HILL, Petitioner, 13 DEATH-PENALTY CASE v. 14 15 Case Number 4-94-cv-641-CW SCHEDULING ORDER Michael MARTEL, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, 16 Respondent. 17 18 The parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement that 19 contains a proposed schedule for the resumption of proceedings in 20 this capital habeas action. 21 appearing therefor, the Court adopts the parties’ jointly 22 proposed schedule as follows. 23 (1) Good cause Within forty-five days from the entry of the present order, the parties shall complete a review of prosecution files. 24 25 (Doc. No. 324.) (2) Within three days following the completion of the review of 26 prosecution files, Petitioner shall file a status report 27 with the Court. 28 (3) Within twenty-one days from the filing of the status report, 1 Petitioner shall file any discovery motion or related 2 pleading; Respondent shall respond to any such motion within 3 thirty days after the motion is filed; Petitioner shall file 4 any reply within fifteen days after the response is filed. 5 (4) Within ninety days from either the entry of an order denying 6 discovery or the conclusion of discovery, Petitioner shall 7 file a motion for a stay pending the conclusion of 8 exhaustion proceedings; Respondent shall respond to any such 9 motion within thirty days after the motion is filed; 10 Petitioner shall file any reply within fifteen days after 11 the response is filed. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 2/24/2012 _______________ ______________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?