Hill v. Ayers
Filing
325
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
Michael HILL,
Petitioner,
13
DEATH-PENALTY CASE
v.
14
15
Case Number 4-94-cv-641-CW
SCHEDULING ORDER
Michael MARTEL, Acting Warden of
San Quentin State Prison,
16
Respondent.
17
18
The parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement that
19
contains a proposed schedule for the resumption of proceedings in
20
this capital habeas action.
21
appearing therefor, the Court adopts the parties’ jointly
22
proposed schedule as follows.
23
(1)
Good cause
Within forty-five days from the entry of the present order,
the parties shall complete a review of prosecution files.
24
25
(Doc. No. 324.)
(2)
Within three days following the completion of the review of
26
prosecution files, Petitioner shall file a status report
27
with the Court.
28
(3)
Within twenty-one days from the filing of the status report,
1
Petitioner shall file any discovery motion or related
2
pleading; Respondent shall respond to any such motion within
3
thirty days after the motion is filed; Petitioner shall file
4
any reply within fifteen days after the response is filed.
5
(4)
Within ninety days from either the entry of an order denying
6
discovery or the conclusion of discovery, Petitioner shall
7
file a motion for a stay pending the conclusion of
8
exhaustion proceedings; Respondent shall respond to any such
9
motion within thirty days after the motion is filed;
10
Petitioner shall file any reply within fifteen days after
11
the response is filed.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:
2/24/2012
_______________
______________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?