Hill v. Ayers
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number 4-94-cv-641-CW
Michael MARTEL, Acting Warden of
San Quentin State Prison,
The parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement that
contains a proposed schedule for the resumption of proceedings in
this capital habeas action.
appearing therefor, the Court adopts the parties’ jointly
proposed schedule as follows.
Within forty-five days from the entry of the present order,
the parties shall complete a review of prosecution files.
(Doc. No. 324.)
Within three days following the completion of the review of
prosecution files, Petitioner shall file a status report
with the Court.
Within twenty-one days from the filing of the status report,
Petitioner shall file any discovery motion or related
pleading; Respondent shall respond to any such motion within
thirty days after the motion is filed; Petitioner shall file
any reply within fifteen days after the response is filed.
Within ninety days from either the entry of an order denying
discovery or the conclusion of discovery, Petitioner shall
file a motion for a stay pending the conclusion of
exhaustion proceedings; Respondent shall respond to any such
motion within thirty days after the motion is filed;
Petitioner shall file any reply within fifteen days after
the response is filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?