Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 1406

ORDER re 1404 Confirming Undisputed Division of Adult Parole Operations Attorneys' Fees and Costs on the Third Quarterly Statement of 2008. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/12/09. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRISON LAW OFFICE DONALD SPECTER 83925 SARA NORMAN 189536 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. LINDA KILB 136101 2212 6th Street Berkeley, California 94710 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 JONES DAY CAROLINE N. MITCHELL - 143124 555 California Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-5712 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BINGHAM McCUTCHEN, LLP WARREN E. GEORGE 53588 FRANK B. KENNAMER 157844 Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4066 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP MICHAEL W. BIEN 096891 ERNEST GALVAN 196065 GAY C. GRUNFELD 121944 HOLLY M. BALDWIN 191317 315 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone (415) 433-6830 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 94 2307 CW ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS ON THE THIRD QUARTERLY STATEMENT OF 2008 [268633-1] PROPOSED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2008 - CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 94 2307 CW ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS ON THE THIRD QUARTERLY STATEMENT OF 2008 On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to collect periodic attorneys' fees and costs in connection with their work monitoring defendants' compliance with the Court's Orders and collecting fees. Pursuant to these procedures, plaintiffs delivered by hand their Third Quarterly Statement for 2008 to defendants on November 6, 2008. Defendants submitted their objections to plaintiffs' statement on December 16, 2008. The parties completed their meet and confer on January 6, 2009, and reached an agreement. The parties agree to the total payment of $73,977.79 in undisputed fees and costs, for monitoring and fee collection activities in the DAPO portion of the case for the Third Quarterly Statement for 2008, which will become due and owing forty-five days from the entry of this Order. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a chart setting forth the balance due. /// /// /// 1 ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2008 CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW [268633-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' fees and costs of $73,977.79, plus interest, are due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees and costs will run from December 8, 2008 accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 1961. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1/12/09 Claudia Wilken United States District Judge APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Jay C. Russell Jay C. Russell Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants DATED: 1/9/09 /s/Holly Baldwin Holly M. Baldwin Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: 1/9/09 2 [268633-1] ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2008 CASE NO. C 94 2307 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?