Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 1740

ORDER re 1739 Granting Stipulation Extending Time in Which Plaintiffs May Move to Compel Compensation at 2010 Rates. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/30/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010)

Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Doc. 1740

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

PRISON LAW OFFICE DONALD SPECTER ­ 83925 SARA NORMAN ­ 189536 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. LINDA KILB ­ 136101 2212 Sixth Street Berkeley, California 94710-2219 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN WARREN E. GEORGE ­ 53588 Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4066 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP MICHAEL W. BIEN ­ 096891 ERNEST GALVAN ­ 196065 GAY CROSTHWAIT GRUNFELD ­ 121944 HOLLY M. BALDWIN - 191317 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH PLAINTIFFS MAY MOVE TO COMPEL COMPENSATION AT 2010
[389661-1]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. Case No. C94 2307 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH PLAINTIFFS MAY MOVE TO COMPEL COMPENSATION AT 2010 RATES

On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which Plaintiffs are to collect periodic attorneys' fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring Defendants' compliance with the Court's Orders and collecting fees (the "Periodic Fees Order"). Pursuant to the Periodic Fees Order, certain fees remain in dispute from the First Quarter of 2010. The parties completed their meet-and-confer process on July 7, 2010 as to the number of hours and costs incurred, but not as to 2010 hourly rates for Plaintiffs' counsel.

RATES CASE NO. C94 2307 CW

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Periodic Fees Order, motions to compel disputed rates are generally due thirty days after the completion of the First Quarter meet and confer; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Compensation at 2010 Rates is currently due to be filed on or about August 6, 2010; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Compensation at 2010 Rates shall be filed on or before August 20, 2010. Dated: July 26, 2010 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP By: /s/ Holly M. Baldwin Holly M. Baldwin Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: July 28, 2010 By: /s/ Jay Russell Jay Russell Attorneys for Defendants

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH PLAINTIFFS MAY MOVE TO COMPEL COMPENSATION AT 2010
[389661-1]

IT IS SO ORDERED.
7/30/2010 DATED: _______________

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

RATES CASE NO. C94 2307 CW