Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 1853

ORDER GRANTING 1848 Stipulation EXTENDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL COMPENSATION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/4/2011. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)

Armstrong, et al v. Brown, et al

Doc. 1853

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JONATHAN L. WOLFF Senior Assistant Attorney General JAY C. RUSSELL Supervising Deputy Attorney General DANIELLE F. O'BANNON Deputy Attorney General SCOTT J. FEUDALE Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 242671 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants

SANFORD JAY ROSEN ROSEN, BIEN, & GALVAN, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 3, 2011, the Court granted Defendants' request for a sixty-day extension of time to file their opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to compel compensation so that they may conduct discovery. (Docket No. 1817) Defendants' opposition is currently due on March 8, 2011 and Plaintiffs' reply on March 21, 2011. (Id.) After the filing of Plaintiffs' reply, the motion shall be submitted on the papers. (Id.) During the month of February, Defendants filed a motion to compel further discovery responses and Plaintiffs moved for a protective order prohibiting further discovery. (Docket Nos.
1 Stip. & Order Extending Briefing Schedule Re: Pls.' Mot. Compel Compensation (C 94 2307 CW)
[481466-1]

JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al.,

Case No. C 94 2307 CW Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL COMPENSATION

v.

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. et. al., Defendants.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1840, 1844.) On March 1, 2011, a case management conference was held. During the conference, the Court stated that it was denying Defendants' motion to compel discovery and granting Plaintiffs' motion for a protective order. The Court further stated that it would allow Plaintiffs leave to supplement the declarations supporting their fees motion, and that if Plaintiffs filed such supplemental declarations they might provide Defendants a reasonable extension of time to review the new evidence and supplement their opposition accordingly. Following the conference, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiffs to file and serve any supplemental declarations no later than March 4, 2011. (Docket No. 1847.) Plaintiffs intend to supplement their evidence in accordance with the Court's order. In light of their decision, the parties agree to extend the briefing schedule as follows: Defendants' opposition shall be filed on or before March 22, 2011. Plaintiffs' reply, if any, shall be filed on or before April 11, 2011. Following the expiration of deadline for the filing of Plaintiffs' reply, the motion will be deemed submitted and shall be decided on the papers. IT IS SO STIPULATED:

2 Stip. & Order Extending Briefing Schedule Re: Pls.' Mot. Compel Compensation (C 94 2307 CW)
[481466-1]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Dated: March 4, 2011

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California /s/ SCOTT J. FEUDALE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: March 3, 2011

ROSEN, BIEN, & GALVAN, LLP

By:________/s/________________ SANFORD J. ROSEN Attorneys for Plaintiffs IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: March 4, 2011

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
3 CF1997CS0005 40486463.doc

_________________________________ THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Stip. & Order Extending Briefing Schedule Re: Pls.' Mot. Compel Compensation (C 94 2307 CW)
[481466-1]