Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al
Filing
1868
ORDER Granting 1864 Stipulation REGARDING JOINT FILING OF PERIODIC STATUS STATEMENTS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/28/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
Armstrong, et al v. Brown, et al
Doc. 1868
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PRISON LAW OFFICE DONALD SPECTER 83925 REBEKAH EVENSON 207825 PENNY GODBOLD 226925 MEGAN HAGLER 230628 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. LINDA KILB 136101 2212 Sixth Street Berkeley, California 94710 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP MICHAEL W. BIEN 096891 GAY C. GRUNFELD 121944 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of the State of California DAVID S. CHANEY Chief Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN L. WOLFF Senior Assistant Attorney General JAY C. RUSSELL 122626 Supervising Deputy Attorney General SCOTT J. FEUDALE 242671 Deputy Attorney General DANIELLE F. O'BANNON 207095 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, California 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5717 Email: Jay.Russell@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR. et al.,1 Defendants.
Case No. C94 2307 CW STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JOINT FILING OF PERIODIC STATUS STATEMENTS
27 28
The names of Defendants currently serving and their capacities have been substituted
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25. 1
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JOINT FILING OF PERIODIC STATUS STATEMENTS CASE NO. C94 2307 CW Dockets.Justia.com
[482722-2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2007, the Court issued an order requiring periodic status conferences at 60 day intervals to monitor compliance with the January 18, 2007 Injunction and prior orders. Docket No. 1045, Injunction, at 5. WHEREAS, the January 18, 2007 Injunction also ordered the parties to file joint statements describing defendants' progress on issues, perceived barriers to future compliance, and suggested methods of overcoming those barriers prior to each status conference. Docket No. 1045, Injunction, at 5. WHEREAS, at the present time the Court will not require that the parties appear before the Court to provide updates on the status of defendants' progress regarding compliance with orders. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: The parties will file periodic joint statements describing the status of the litigation. The joint statements will be filed on the fifteenth day of every other month (or the first business day thereafter), beginning on May 16, 2011. The parties separately or jointly may request that the Court set further status conferences on an as needed basis.
Dated: March 24, 2011
PRISON LAW OFFICE /s/ Rebekah Evenson By: Rebekah Evenson Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: March _24, 2011 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/28/2011
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California /s/ Jay C. Russell By: Jay C. Russell Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants
____________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JOINT FILING OF PERIODIC STATUS STATEMENTS CASE NO. C94 2307 CW
[482722-2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Pursuant to Northern District General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have on file approvals for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: March 24, 2011 Respectfully submitted, PRISON LAW OFFICE /s/ Rebekah Evenson By: Rebekah Evenson Attorneys for Plaintiffs
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JOINT FILING OF PERIODIC STATUS STATEMENTS CASE NO. C94 2307 CW
[482722-2]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?