Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 2623

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 2622 Stipulation Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the First Quarter of 2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925 CORENE KENDRICK – 226642 2 PENNY GODBOLD – 226925 PRISON LAW OFFICE 3 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 4 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704 5 LINDA D. KILB – 136101 6 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. 7 3075 Adeline Street, Suite 201 Berkeley, California 94703 8 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 Facsimile: (510) 841-8645 9 GEOFFREY T. HOLTZ – 191370 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1596 Telephone: (415) 442-1000 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 GAY C. GRUNFELD – 121944 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLPth 50 Fremont St, 19 Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiff, 16 17 v. Case No. C94 2307 CW [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2016 18 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [3007555-1] [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2016 1 On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which Plaintiffs 2 are to collect periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work 3 monitoring Defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees. 4 Pursuant to these procedures, on April 26, 2016 Plaintiffs served on Defendants 5 their First Quarterly Statement for 2016 by overnight delivery. The parties completed their 6 meet-and-confer process on June 10, 2016 as to the fees and costs incurred on all matters. 7 As a result of the June 10, 2016 agreement, the parties agree to the following: 8 The parties agree to the payment of $1,310,790.86 to resolve all fees and costs 9 incurred during the First Quarter of 2016, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the 10 California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations and 11 Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are 12 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by 13 the parties to settle these claims. 14 The parties agree to the payment of $48,799.84 to resolve all fees and costs incurred 15 during the First Quarter of 2016, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the Board of 16 Parole Hearings (BPH) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are charts setting 17 forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the parties to 18 settle these claims. 19 The parties agree to the payment of $194,012.04 to resolve all fees and costs 20 incurred during the First Quarter of 2016, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the 21 Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portion of the case. Attached hereto as 22 Exhibit C are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts 23 agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. 24 The parties agree to the payment of $13,711.32 to resolve all fees and costs incurred 25 during the First Quarter of 2016, for fees on fees. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are charts 26 setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the 27 parties to settle these claims. 28 \\ [3007555-1] 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2016 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amounts set forth above are due and 2 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees 3 and costs will run from May 27, 2016, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 4 5 DATED: _____________________ 6/15/2016 6 7 THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 11 12 DATED: June 14, 2016 13 14 15 DATED: June 14, 2016 16 17 /s/ Sharon A. Garske Sharon A. Garske Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants /s/ Gay C. Grunfeld Gay C. Grunfeld Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP Attorney for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [3007555-1] 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2016 EXHIBIT A Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 CDCR/AOAP SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER CDCR/AOAP MONITORING UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $1,274,050.70 $36,740.16 TOTAL: $1,310,790.86 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Matter: CDCR/AOAP Monitoring/Merits Monitoring (581-3) Actual Hours Claimed Hours 2016 Rates Total Claimed Fees Fees Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD Michael W. Bien (MWB) Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Jane Kahn (JEK) Thomas Nolan (TN) Lisa Ells (LAE) Blake Thompson (BT) Michael Freedman (MLF) Ben Bien-Kahn (BBK) Krista Stone-Manista (KSM) Christopher Hu (CDH) Karen Stilber (KES) Linda Woo (LHW) F. Gail LaPurja (FGL) Fely Villadelgado (FFV) Greg Gonzalez (GZG) Lauren Vandemortel (LWV) Katherine Hamilton (KCH) Charlotte Landes (CJL) Kelly McGraw (KAM) Sasha Beder-Schenker (SBS) Total Hours: Total RBGG Fees: 5.70 46.20 0.20 284.90 3.80 77.70 162.20 38.90 61.90 14.50 60.00 31.00 44.00 0.20 28.30 22.90 308.60 64.30 305.00 12.70 1,573.00 5.70 46.20 0.00 278.60 0.00 76.10 160.00 32.10 61.20 12.40 56.70 28.40 38.60 0.00 25.90 19.30 263.80 55.90 273.50 0.00 1,434.40 $900 $790 $700 $610 $600 $565 $545 $490 $490 $410 $300 $300 $275 $275 $275 $260 $230 $230 $230 $230 $5,130.00 $36,498.00 $0.00 $169,946.00 $0.00 $42,996.50 $87,200.00 $15,729.00 $29,988.00 $5,084.00 $17,010.00 $8,520.00 $10,615.00 $0.00 $7,122.50 $5,018.00 $60,674.00 $12,857.00 $62,905.00 $0.00 $4,873.50 $34,673.10 $0.00 $161,448.70 $0.00 $40,846.68 $82,840.00 $14,942.55 $28,488.60 $4,829.80 $16,159.50 $8,094.00 $10,084.25 $0.00 $6,766.38 $4,767.10 $57,640.30 $12,214.15 $59,759.75 $0.00 $577,293.00 $548,428.35 $67,050.00 $1,445.00 $178,500.00 $112,255.00 $83,265.00 $51,754.00 $31,425.00 $67,146.00 $52,925.00 $18,625.00 $11,525.00 $49,200.00 $13,450.00 $9,925.00 $14,875.00 $63,697.50 $1,372.75 $169,575.00 $106,642.25 $79,101.75 $49,166.30 $29,853.75 $63,788.70 $50,278.75 $17,693.75 $10,948.75 $46,740.00 $12,777.50 $9,428.75 $14,131.25 $763,365.00 $725,196.75 $448.00 $425.60 $448.00 $425.60 $1,341,106.00 $1,274,050.70 PRISON LAW OFFICE Donald Specter (DS) Steve Fama (SF) Rebekah Evenson (RE) Penny Godbold (PG) Corene Kendrick (CK) Kelly Knapp (KK) Gwen Wu (GW) Amber Norris (AN) Anjuli Branz (AB) Laura Graham (LG) Isaac Da ke (ID) Megan Lynch (ML) Nora Searle (NS) Liliana Paratore (LP) Alex Kennedy (AK) Total Hours: Total PLO Fees: 74.50 1.70 255.00 172.70 128.10 91.60 83.80 216.60 211.70 74.50 46.10 164.00 53.80 39.70 59.50 1,673.30 74.50 1.70 255.00 172.70 128.10 91.60 83.80 216.60 211.70 74.50 46.10 164.00 53.80 39.70 59.50 1,673.30 $900 $850 $700 $650 $650 $565 $375 $310 $250 $250 $250 $300 $250 $250 $250 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND Hongyu Min (HM) Total Hours: Total DREDF Fees: TOTAL UNDISPUTED CDCR/AOAP MONITORING FEES: 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 $160 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Costs Matter: CDCR/AOAP Merits/Monitoring Total Claimed Costs $2,273.60 $2,205.81 $125.00 $213.45 $502.44 $11,950.93 $11.15 Costs Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise $2,159.92 $2,095.52 $118.75 $202.78 $477.32 $11,353.38 $10.59 $17,282.38 $16,418.26 $2,608.20 $729.24 $16,388.00 $1,449.45 $2,477.79 $692.78 $15,568.60 $1,376.98 $21,174.89 $20,116.15 $168.80 $47.78 $160.36 $45.39 Total DREDF Costs: $216.58 $205.75 TOTAL UNDISPUTED CDCR/AOAP MERITS/MONITORING COSTS: $38,673.85 $36,740.16 Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-3) Photocopying (In house) Photocopying/printing (Outside) Translation services Online Research - PACER, Westlaw Postage & Delivery Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Telephone Total RBGG Costs: Prison Law Office Photocopying (In house) Translation services Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Postage & Delivery Total PLO Costs: Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, Inc. Photocopying (in-house) Postage & Delivery EXHIBIT B Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 BPH SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER BPH UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COST $48,254.78 $545.06 TOTAL: $48,799.84 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Matter: BPH BPH (581-4) Actual Hours Claimed Hours 2016 Rates Total Claimed Fees Fees Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise BPH MONITORING (581-4) ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Thomas Nolan (TN) Blake Thompson (BT) Margot K. Mendelson (MKM) Katherine Hamilton (KCH) Total Hours: Total RBGG Fees: 0.10 0.40 21.20 18.80 7.40 47.90 0.10 0.00 19.90 18.30 0.00 38.30 $790 $610 $565 $490 $230 $79.00 $0.00 $11,243.50 $8,967.00 $0.00 $75.05 $0.00 $10,681.33 $8,518.65 $0.00 $20,289.50 $19,275.03 $19,725.00 $10,780.00 $18,738.75 $10,241.00 $30,505.00 $28,979.75 $50,794.50 $48,254.78 PRISON LAW OFFICE Sara Norman (SN) Rana Anabtawi (RA) Total Hours: Total PLO Fees: TOTAL UNDISPUTED FEES FOR BPH WORK: 26.30 22.00 26.30 26.30 22.00 26.30 $750 $490 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Costs Matter: BPH Total Claimed Costs $182.20 $120.19 Costs Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise $173.09 $114.18 Total RBGG Costs: $302.39 $287.27 $271.36 $257.79 Total PLO Costs: $271.36 $257.79 TOTAL UNDISPUTED BPH COSTS: $573.75 $545.06 Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-4) Photocopying (In house) Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Prison Law Office Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food EXHIBIT C Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 DAPO SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER DAPO MONITORING UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $189,999.53 $4,012.52 TOTAL: $194,012.04 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Matter: DAPO Monitoring DAPO Monitoring (581-9) Actual Hours Claimed Hours 2016 Rates Total Claimed Fees Fees Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD Michael W. Bien (MWB) Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Ernest Galvan (EG) Aaron Fischer (AJF) Blake Thompson (BT) Michael Freedman (MLF) Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK) Margot Mendelson (MKM) Krista Stone-Manista (KSM) Jenny Yelin (JSY) Christopher Hu (CDH) Karen Stilber (KES) F. Gail LaPurja (FGL) Kelly McGraw (KAM) Katherine Hamilton (KCH) Nathalie Welch (NCW) Total Hours: Total RBGG Fees: TOTAL UNDISPUTED FOR DAPO MONITORING WORK: 0.30 7.50 0.60 63.50 22.20 2.30 76.40 42.70 0.30 11.20 69.90 0.90 31.80 42.60 0.70 217.50 590.40 0.00 7.50 0.00 63.30 21.70 0.00 71.40 40.80 0.00 10.80 68.80 0.00 26.90 39.00 0.00 177.10 527.30 $900 $790 $740 $575 $565 $545 $490 $490 $490 $475 $410 $300 $275 $230 $230 $230 $0.00 $5,925.00 $0.00 $36,397.50 $12,260.50 $0.00 $34,986.00 $19,992.00 $0.00 $5,130.00 $28,208.00 $0.00 $7,397.50 $8,970.00 $0.00 $40,733.00 $0.00 $5,628.75 $0.00 $34,577.63 $11,647.48 $0.00 $33,236.70 $18,992.40 $0.00 $4,873.50 $26,797.60 $0.00 $7,027.63 $8,521.50 $0.00 $38,696.35 $199,999.50 $189,999.53 $199,999.50 $189,999.53 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Costs Matter: DAPO Monitoring Total Claimed Costs $1,041.40 $357.69 $957.96 $8.40 $1,858.25 Costs Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise $989.33 $339.81 $910.06 $7.98 $1,765.34 Total RBGG Costs: $4,223.70 $4,012.52 TOTAL UNDISPUTED DAPO MONITORING COSTS: $4,223.70 $4,012.52 Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-9) Photocopying (in-house) Photocopying (outside) Interpeting Services Telephone Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food EXHIBIT D Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES WORK AND COSTS UNDISPUTED FEES FEES WORK (ALL MATTERS) UNDISPUTED COSTS $13,483.35 $227.97 TOTAL: $13,711.32 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Matter: All Matters Fees Work Fees (581-2) Actual Hours Claimed Hours 2016 Rates Total Claimed Fees Fees Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Lisa Ells (LAE) Aaron Fischer (AJF) Blake Thompson (BT) Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK) F. Gail LaPurja (FGL) Lauren Vandemortel (LWV) Katherine Hamilton (KCH) Total Hours: Total RBGG Fees: 0.90 0.10 1.00 9.90 0.20 0.20 20.60 0.40 33.30 0.80 0.00 0.50 9.10 0.00 0.00 20.10 0.00 30.50 $790 $600 $575 $565 $490 $275 $260 $230 $632.00 $0.00 $287.50 $5,141.50 $0.00 $0.00 $5,226.00 $0.00 $600.40 $0.00 $273.13 $4,884.43 $0.00 $0.00 $4,964.70 $0.00 $11,287.00 $10,722.65 $1,470.00 $1,120.00 $1,396.50 $1,064.00 $2,590.00 $2,460.50 $316.00 $300.20 $316.00 $300.20 $14,193.00 $13,483.35 PRISON LAW OFFICE 2.1 5.6 Rebekah Evenson (RE) Ashley Kirby (AK) Total Hours: Total PLO Fees: 2.1 5.6 7.70 7.70 $700 $200 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND Linda Kilb (LDK) Total Hours: Total DREDF Fees: TOTAL UNDISPUTED FEES FOR ARMSTRONG FEES WORK: 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 $790 Armstrong v. Brown First Quarterly Statement of 2016 January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016 Costs Matter: Fees Work in All Matters Total Claimed Costs $207.20 $19.57 Costs Now Owing Based On Negotiated Compromise $196.84 $18.59 Total RBGG Costs: $226.77 $215.43 $13.20 $12.54 Total DREDF Costs: $13.20 $12.54 TOTAL UNDISPUTED FEES WORK COSTS : $239.97 $227.97 Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-2) Photocopying and Printing (in-house) Postage & Delivery Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, Inc. Photocopying (in-house)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?