Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al
Filing
3413
ORDER RE: PRO SE LETTERS AND FILINGS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/18/2022. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
10
v.
Case No. 94-cv-02307 CW
ORDER RE: PRO SE LETTERS AND
FILINGS
GAVIN C. NEWSOM, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
The above-titled case is a class action, with attorneys representing the class. The Court
13
routinely receives pro se letters and other requests by persons who may be members of the class.
14
Because the class in this action is represented by counsel, members of the class may file motions,
15
requests, and letters only through their counsel of record. Persons who are not members of the
16
class may not seek relief in this case. Accordingly, with good cause appearing, the Court
17
HEREBY ORDERS the Clerk to forward pro se filings in this case to counsel of record for the
18
class, namely Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP, 101 Mission Street, 6th floor, San Francisco,
19
CA 94104, and inform the inmate by copy of this order that it has done so. The Court will not
20
retain copies of the pro se attempted filings that are forwarded to counsel. Counsel may return to
21
the Court any attempted filings that they believe require Court review and are beyond the scope of
22
this action or were filed by persons who are not members of the class.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 18, 2022
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?