Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al
Filing
3429
Order by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 3427 Stipulation Confirming Undisputed Attorneys Fees and Costs for the Second Quarter of 2022.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 28
1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925
RITA K. LOMIO – 254501
2 MARGOT MENDELSON – 268583
PRISON LAW OFFICE
3 1917 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710-1916
4 Telephone: (510) 280-2621
Facsimile: (510) 280-2704
5
MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891
6 GAY C. GRUNFELD – 121944
PENNY GODBOLD – 226925
7 MICHAEL FREEDMAN – 262850
ROSEN BIEN
8 GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
101 Mission Street, Sixth Floor
9 San Francisco, California 94105-1738
Telephone: (415) 433-6830
10 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104
11 LINDA D. KILB – 136101
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION &
12 DEFENSE FUND, INC.
3075 Adeline Street, Suite 201
13 Berkeley, California 94703
Telephone: (510) 644-2555
14 Facsimile: (510) 841-8645
15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al.,
Case No. C94 2307 CW
21
23 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
STIPULATED ORDER
CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF
2022
24
Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
[4151525.1]
Case No. C94 2307 CW
STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND
QUARTER 2022
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 28
1
On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which Plaintiffs
2 are to collect periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work
3 monitoring Defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees.
4
Pursuant to these procedures, on July 20, 2022, Plaintiffs served on Defendants
5 their Second Quarterly Statement for 2022 by electronic transmission. The parties
6 completed their meet-and-confer process on September 2, 2022 as to the fees and costs
7 incurred on all matters.
8
As a result of the September 2, 2022 agreement, the parties agree to the following:
9
The parties agree to the payment of $2,327,859.87 to resolve all fees and costs
10 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in
11 the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations
12 and Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are
13 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by
14 the parties to settle these claims.
15
The parties agree to the payment of $132,141.20 to resolve all fees and costs
16 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in
17 the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are
18 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by
19 the parties to settle these claims.
20
The parties agree to the payment of $175,496.85 to resolve all fees and costs
21 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in
22 the Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portion of the case. Attached hereto as
23 Exhibit C are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts
24 agreed to by the parties to settle these claims.
25
The parties agree to the payment of $23,110.59 to resolve all fees and costs incurred
26 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for fees work. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are charts
27 setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the
28 parties to settle these claims.
[4151525.1]
Case No. C94 2307 CW
2
STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND
QUARTER 2022
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 3 of 28
1
The parties agree to the payment of $26,767.75 to resolve all fees and costs incurred
2 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for litigation activities in the appeal of the RJD Order,
3 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 20-16921. Attached hereto as Exhibit E are
4 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by
5 the parties to settle these claims.
6
The parties agree to the payment of $5,544.00 to resolve all fees and costs incurred
7 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for litigation activities in the appeal of the Five Prisons
8 Order, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 21-15614. Attached hereto as Exhibit F
9 are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to
10 by the parties to settle these claims.
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amounts set forth above are due and
12 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees
13 and costs will run from August 22, 2022, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C.
14 § 1961.
15
16 DATED: September 12, 2022
17
Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
18
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
[4151525.1]
Case No. C94 2307 CW
3
STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND
QUARTER 2022
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 4 of 28
1
2 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
3
4 DATED: September 6, 2022
5
6
/s/Sharon Garske
Sharon Garske
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
7
8 DATED: September 6, 2022
9
10
/s/Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP
Attorney for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[4151525.1]
Case No. C94 2307 CW
4
STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND
QUARTER 2022
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 5 of 28
E,XHIBIT A
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 6 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
Aprif '1,2022 through June 30,2022
CDCR/AOAP SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS
MATTER
CDCR/AOAP MONITORING
UNDISPUTED FEES
UNDISPUTED COSTS
$2,247,921.64
$79,938.23
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$2,327,859.87
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 7 of 28
Armstrong v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022
Mafter: CDCR/AOAP Monitoring/Merits
Actual
Monitoring (581-3)
Claimed
Rates
HoursHours
ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD
MichaelW Bien (M\ ,8)
16.00
74.40
0.5
15.40
74.40
o.2
369.40
233.30
369.30
230.30
0.00
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
Ernest Galvan (EG)
Penny Godbold (PG)
Thomas Nolan (TN)
Jenny S. Yelin (JY)
Michael L. Freedman (MLF)
$575
03.1 0
$500
$425
$400
$400
$375
$375
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$260
$260
$51,550.00
$22,992.s0
$260
$37,31 0.00
5.40
Greg Gonzalez (GzG)
Nathalie welch (NW
54.10
43.30
0.00
0.00
5.50
10.20
24s.10
242.80
27.OO
23.90
302.'10
0.00
344.00
98.80
14.70
1
87.50
5.00
41.50
20.50
147.10
14.60
275.60
8.80
21.70
290.00
Total
1
7.10
1.90
1
Zoe Cullison-Shimada (zS)
lsabel Ting (lT)
$0.00
$'t 13,475.00
$36,902.50
$1 34,81 0.00
4.90
55.10
43.80
o.20
Kelly Mu (KM)
Hannah Potter (HP)
$284,361.00
$182,872.59
$0,00
$650
$675
'103.30
Sarah A. Corkum (SAC)
$295,440.00
$1 89,997.50
207.40
Hannah Chartoff (HC)
Karen Stilber (KES)
Linda Woo (LHW
F. Gail LaPuria (FGL)
Teya Khalil (TK)
$20,751.50
$71,610.00
$1 82.88
219.40
4.90
Rebecca Berman (RB)
Adam Dean (AD)
Sanjana Srinivasan (SS)
Yesi Murillo (YM)
Ellen T. Brancart (ETB)
$21,560.00
$74,400.00
$l 90.00
5'1.70
58.50
Jack Gleiberman (JG)
Ellinor Hewood (EH)
Morgan Botelle (MB)
Fely F. Villadelgado (FFV)
$1,400
$1,000
$950
$800
$825
$750
$7s0
$725
Total
151.30
50.90
't
Ben Bien-Kahn (BBK)
Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ)
Michael S. Nunez (MSN)
Priyah Kaul (PK)
Eric Monek Anderson (EMA)
0.1 0
54.00
Fees Now Owlng
Based On Negotlated
Compromlse
2022
Hours: 3,150.90
13.40
187.sO
0.00
35.10
20.10
143.50
14.60
262.40
0.00
21.40
258.90
$260
$260
$260
$260
$260
822,342.50
$2,81 7.50
7,320.00
$1
$1
09,21
9.69
$35,518.66
$'129,754.63
$21,504.66
$2,711.84
$49,616.88
$22,',|30.28
$1
6,670.50
$0.00
$0.00
$1,985.1 6
$0.00
$0.00
$2,062.s0
$3,060.00
$2,945.25
$72,840.00
$70,1 08.50
$7,1 70.00
$90,630.00
$0.00
$4,020.00
$6,901.13
$87,231.38
$0.00
$3,869.25
$56,250.00
$54,140.63
$0.00
$0.00
$9,126.00
$5,226.00
$8,783.78
$5,030.03
$35,91 0.88
$3,796.00
$68,224.OO
$0.00
$5,564.00
$67,31
4.00
$3,653.65
$65,665.60
$0,00
$5,355.35
$64,789.73
2,879.10
$1,416,390.00
RBGG FEES:
$1,363,275.38
PRISON LAW OFFICE
6.90
6.90
1.40
't91.70
1.40
191.70
66.90
267.AO
Patrick Booth (PB)
18.60
267.80
172.40
Amber Norris (AN)
120.40
Claudia Cesena (CS)
Tania Amarillas (TA)
Gabriela Pelsinger (GP)
Skye Lovett (SL)
119.70
Donald Specter (DS)
Sara Norman (SN)
Rita Lomio (RL)
Margot Mendelson (MM)
Tess Borden (TB)
Jacob Hutt (JH)
351.40
112.20
376.80
46.60
Alondra Diaz-Saavedra
$1,100
$900
$725
$'138,982.50
66.90
$700
$46,830.00
$45,073.88
18.60
$10,230.00
$127,205.OO
172.40
$550
$475
$400
$68,960.00
$9,846.38
$122,434.81
$66,374.00
120.40
$400
$48,160.00
$46,354.00
119.70
351.40
$400
$47,880.00
$1 22,990.00
$39,270.00
$46,084.50
$'1'18,377.88
$37,797.38
$117,867.75
$l 3,455.75
112.20
376.80
46.60
109.80
56.80
44.50
104.80
19.50
1 09.80
56.80
44.50
Juliette Mueller (Jli)
Katherine Hong (KH)
Korbin F€lder (KF)
13. 10
13.'10
7.90
'1.10
7.90
1.10
Michael Brodheim
Sophie Mishara (SN4)
0.50
0.50
AudrBy Lim (AL)
Dewi Zarni (DZ)
llian Meza Pena (lP)
lsabela Avila Breach (lAB)
Joanna Cardenas (JC)
1
04.80
'19.50
Total Hours:
52.30
2,263.10
$350
$350
$325
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$300
$7,590.00
$1,260.00
$122,460.00
$1 3,980.00
$31,440.00
$5,850.00
$7,305.38
$1,2',12.75
$1
33,770.66
$30,261.00
$5,630.63
$32,940.00
$31,704.7s
7,040.00
$13,350.00
$16,401.00
$ 1 2,849.38
$1
$330.00
$3,782.63
$2,281.13
$31 7.63
$150.00
5,690.00
$144.38
$15,101.63
8,887.50
1884,429.22
$3,930.00
$2,370.00
$1
2,263.10
PLO FEES:
$91
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND
DEFENSE FUND
Case Clerk (H. Min)
Total Hours:
DREDF FEES:
1.10
'1.'10
1.10
1.10
$205
$225.sO
$217.O4
$225.50
9217.04
TOTAL CDCR/AOAP MONITORING
FEES:
$2,335,503.00
$2,247,921.64
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 8 of 28
Armstrong v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement ot 2022
April '1, 2022 through June 30,2022
Costs
Matter: CDCR(AOAP Merits/Monitori ns
Costs Now Owing
Based on Negotiated
Costs
Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-3)
Photocopying (ln house)
Photocopying/printing (Outside)
Expert Services
Transcription and Translation
Online Research - PACER, Westlaw, State courts
Postage & Delivery
Compromise
$1,693.60
$2,069.21
$42,600.35
$490.1 4
$41,002.84
$382.98
$368.62
$1,038.34
$999'40
$5'78
$6.00
Telephone
Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food
Total RBGG Costs
$1,630.09
$2,149.83
$471.76
$12,416.90
$11,951.27
$60,778.14
$58,498.96
Prison Law Office
lnterpreting/SLl/Translation services
Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food
Postage & Delivery
$3,817.49
$3,674.33
$'t7,384.84
$16,732.91
$974.94
Total PLO Gosts:
$22,177.27
$938.38
$21,345.62
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, lnc.
$77.00
Photocopying (in-house)
$80.00
Postage & Delivery
$17.30
$16.65
Tota!DREDF Costs:
$97.30
$e3.65
TOTAL CLAIMED CDCRYAOAP MERITS/MONITORING GOSTS:
$83,052.71
$79,938.23
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 9 of 28
EXHIBIT B
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 10 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsqno
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1,2022 through June 30,2022
BPH SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS
MATTER
BPH
UNDISPUTED
FEES
UNDISPUTED COSTS
$132,'136.81
$4.3e
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$132,141.20
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 11 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022 through June 30,2Q22
Matter: BPH
Actual
BPH (581-4)
Claimed
Hours Hours
2022
Rates
Total
Fees Now Owing
Based On Neootiated
Compromise
BPH MONITORING (581.4)
ROSEN, BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD
1.50
Michael W. Bien (MWB)
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
5.5
49.80
2.00
Thomas Nolan (TN)
Penny Godbold (PG)
Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK)
Michael S. Nunez (MSN)
Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ)39.10
Karen E. Stilber (KES)
Nathalie Welch (NW)
Adam Dean (AD)
0.10
49.80
3.80
58.90
9.60
Total Hours:
220.10
1.50
5.5
47.50
2.00
0.00
25.50
37.90
3.80
57.70
9.60
191 .00
$1,400
$2,1 00.00
$1,000
$825
$800
$5,500.00
$39,1 87.50
$725
$675
$650
$400
$300
$300
RBGG FEES:
$1,600.00
$0.00
$'17,212.50
$24,635.00
$1,520.00
$17,310.00
$2,880.00
$2,021.25
$5,293.75
$37,717.97
$1,540.00
$0.00
$16,567.03
$23,711.19
$1,463.00
$16,660.88
$2,772.00
$111,945.00
$107,747.06
$360.00
$1,232.50
$19,040.00
$1,430.00
$3,277.50
$346.50
,186.28
$18,326.00
$1,376.38
$3,154.59
$25,340.00
$24,389.75
$137,285.00
$132,136.81
PRISON LAW OFFICE
Sara Norman (SN)
Rita Lomio (RL)
Rana Anabtawi (RA)
Tess Borden (TB)
Jacob Hutt (JH)
Total Hours:
PLO FEES
TOTAL FEES FOR
BPH WORK:
0.40
1.70
27.20
2.60
6.9
0.40
1.70
27.20
2.60
6.9
38.80
38.80
$900
$725
$700
$550
$475
$1
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 12 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement o12022
April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022
Costs
Matter: BPH
Costs Now Owing
Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581'4)
Based on Nesotiated
Costs
Photocopying (ln house)
Postage and delivery
Compromise
$2.60
$2'50
$1.96
$1.89
Total RBGG Costs
$4.56
$4'39
TOTAL CLAIMED BPH GOSTS:
$4.56
$4.39
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 13 of 28
EXHIBIT C
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 14 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1,2022 through June 30,2022
DAPO SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS
MATTER
DAPO MONITORING
UNDISPUTED FEES
UNDISPUTED COST
$174,413.18
$1,083.67
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$175,496.85
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 15 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April'1, 2022 through June 30, 2022
M alTer : D A
P
O M on itori n g
Actual
DAPO Monitorino (581 -9)
Claimed
Hours Hours
Fees Now Owing
Based On Neqotiated
Compromise
2022
Rates
Total
ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD
Michael W. Bien (MWB)
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
Penny Godbold (PG)
0.60
7.30
9.40
13.30
75.30
Thomas Nolan (TN)
Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK)
Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ)30.20
Priyah Kaul (PK)
Eric Monek Anderson (EMA)
Hannah Chartoff (HC)
Fely F. Villadelgado (FFV)
Nathalie Welch (NCW)
Rebecca Berman (RB)
Jack Gleiberman (JG)
Sarah A. Corkum (SAC)
lsabel Ting (lT)
Adam Dean (AD)
11.80
11.80
13.50
2.00
204.60
3.90
8.10
21.10
0.20
0.30
Total Hours:
RBGG FEES:
TOTAL FOR DAPO MONITORING
WORK:
413.40
0.00
7.30
9.40
13.30
72.90
29.70
11.40
11.80
13.50
0.00
191.60
0.00
7.00
21 .10
0.00
0.00
$1,400
$1,000
$800
$825
$725
$0.00
$0.00
$7,300.00
$7,520.00
$10,972.50
$7,026.25
$650
$52,852.50
$19,305.00
$575
$500
$425
$300
$6,555.00
$5,900.00
$5,737.50
$0.00
$300
$300
$300
$260
$260
$57,480.00
$0.00
$300
$2,100.00
$5,486.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7,238.00
$10,561.03
$50,870.53
$18,581.06
$6,309.19
$5,678.75
$5,522.34
$0.00
$55,324.50
$0.00
$2,021.25
$5,280.28
$0.00
$0.00
389.00
$181,208.50
$174,413.18
$181,208.50
$174,413.18
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 16 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022
Costs
Matter: DAPO Monitoring
Costs Now Owing
Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-9)
Based on NePotiated
Costs
Photocopying (in-house)
Postage & Delivery
Long distance and videophone charges
Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food
Compromise
$255.80
$246.21
$87.77
$84.48
$0.1 0
$0'10
$782.22
$752.89
TotalRBGG Costs:
$1,125.89
$1,083.67
TOTAL CLAIMED DAPO MONITORING COSTS:
$1,125.89
$1,083.67
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 17 of 28
E
)
)
IT I}
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 18 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1,2022 through June 30,2022
SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES WORK AND COSTS
UNDISPUTED
FEES WORK (ALL MATTERS)
FEES
UNDISPUTED COSTS
$22,989.31
$121.28
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$23,110.59
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 19 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April '1, 2022 through June 30,2O22
Matter: AII Matters Fees Work
Actual
Fees (581-2)
2022
Claimed
Hours Hours
Rates
Total
Fees Now Owing
Based On Neqotiated
Compromise
ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
Ernest Galvan (EG)
Karen E. Stilber (KES)
Morgan Botelle (MKB)
Total Hours:
14.50
14.50
0.40
11.60
0.40
1 1.60
0.20
0.00
26.70
26.50
$1,000
$950
$400
$300
RBGG FEES:
$14,500.00
$380.00
$13,956.25
$365.75
$4,640.00
$0.00
$4,466.00
$0.00
$19,520.00
$18,788.00
$1,820.00
$1,600.00
$1,751.75
$1,540.00
$3,420.00
$3,291.75
$945.00
$909.56
$945.00
$e09.56
$23,885.00
$22,989.31
PRISON LAW OFFICE
Margot Mendelson (MKM)
Ashley Kirby (AK)
Total Hours
2.60
6.40
9.00
2.60
$700
6.40
9.00
$250
PLO FEES:
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND
DEFENSE FUND
Linda Kilb (LDK)
Total Hours:
DREDF FEES:
TOTAL FEES FOR ARMSTRONG
FEES WORK:
1.00
1.00
00
00
$945
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 20 of 28
Armstronq v, Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1,2022 through June 30,2022
Gosts
Matter: Fees Work in All Matters
Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-2)
Costs Now Owing
Based on Negotiated
Costs
Compromise
$86.00
Photocopying and Printing (in-house)
Postage & Delivery
TotalRBGG Costs:
TOTAL CLAIMED FEES WORK GOSTS
:
s82.78
$40.00
S38'so
$126.00
$121.28
$126.00
$121.28
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 21 of 28
EXHIBIT E
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 22 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1,2022through June 30,2022
APPEAL OF RJD ORDER SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS
MATTER
APPEAL OF RJD ORDER
UNDISPU TED FEES
UNDISPUTED COSTS
$26,560.19
$207.56
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$26,767.75
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 23 of 28
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022through June 30,2022
Matter: Appeal of RJD Order
Fees (581-191
Actual
Claimed
Hours Hours
2022
Rates
Total
Fees Now Owing
Based On Neqotiated
Comoromise
ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
Michael L. Freedman (MLF)
Hanna Chartoff (HC)
Karen E. Stilber (KES)
RBGG Fees:
TOTAL FEES FOR APPEAL OF RJD
ORDER:
3.00
3.00
32.20
0.20
0.90
32.20
0.20
0.90
36.30
36.30
$2,887.50
$1,000
$750
$3,000.00
$24,150.00
$23,244.38
$425
$85.00
$360.00
$346.50
$27,595.00
$26,560.19
$27,595.00
$26,560.19
$400
$81.81
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 24 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022
Costs
Matter: Appeal of RJD Order
Costs Now Owing
Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-19)
Gosts
Westlaw research
TotalRBGG Gosts
Based on Neeotiated
Compromise
$215.65
$207.56
$215.65
$207.56
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 25 of 28
EXHTBIT F
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 26 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement ol 2022
April 1,2022 through June 30,2022
APPEAL OF 5 PRISONS ORDER SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES
AND COSTS
UNDISPUTED FEES
MATTER
APPEAL OF 5 PRISONS ORDER
UNDISPUTED COSTS
$5,274.50
$269.50
TOTAL UNDISPUTED:
$5,544.00
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 27 of 28
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022
Matter: Appeal of 5PR/SOilS Order
Fees (581-20)
Actual
Claimed
Hours Hours
Fees Now Owing
Based On Neqotiated
Compromise
2022
Rates
Total
ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD
Michael W. Bien (MWB)
Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG)
Karen E. Stilber (KES)
TOTAL FEES FOR APPEAL OF 5
PRISONS ORDER:
0.5
0.5
4.30
1.20
4.30
1.20
5.50
5.50
$1,400
$1,000
$400
$5,480.00
$673.75
$4,138.75
$462.00
$5,274.50
$5,480.00
$5,274.50
$700
$4,300.00
$480.00
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 28 of 28
Armstronq v. Newsom
Second Quarterly Statement of 2022
April 1, 2022through June 30,2022
Gosts
Matter: Appeal of Five Prisons Order
Costs Now Owing
Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-20)
Costs
ln house copying and printing
TotalRBGG Costs:
Based on Nesotiated
Compromise
$280.00
$269.50
$280.00
$269.50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?