Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 3429

Order by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 3427 Stipulation Confirming Undisputed Attorneys Fees and Costs for the Second Quarter of 2022.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 28 1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925 RITA K. LOMIO – 254501 2 MARGOT MENDELSON – 268583 PRISON LAW OFFICE 3 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 4 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704 5 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 6 GAY C. GRUNFELD – 121944 PENNY GODBOLD – 226925 7 MICHAEL FREEDMAN – 262850 ROSEN BIEN 8 GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 101 Mission Street, Sixth Floor 9 San Francisco, California 94105-1738 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 10 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 11 LINDA D. KILB – 136101 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & 12 DEFENSE FUND, INC. 3075 Adeline Street, Suite 201 13 Berkeley, California 94703 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 14 Facsimile: (510) 841-8645 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Case No. C94 2307 CW 21 23 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2022 24 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 22 Plaintiffs, v. Defendants. 25 26 27 28 [4151525.1] Case No. C94 2307 CW STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER 2022 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 28 1 On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which Plaintiffs 2 are to collect periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work 3 monitoring Defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees. 4 Pursuant to these procedures, on July 20, 2022, Plaintiffs served on Defendants 5 their Second Quarterly Statement for 2022 by electronic transmission. The parties 6 completed their meet-and-confer process on September 2, 2022 as to the fees and costs 7 incurred on all matters. 8 As a result of the September 2, 2022 agreement, the parties agree to the following: 9 The parties agree to the payment of $2,327,859.87 to resolve all fees and costs 10 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in 11 the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations 12 and Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are 13 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by 14 the parties to settle these claims. 15 The parties agree to the payment of $132,141.20 to resolve all fees and costs 16 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in 17 the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are 18 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by 19 the parties to settle these claims. 20 The parties agree to the payment of $175,496.85 to resolve all fees and costs 21 incurred during the Second Quarter of 2022, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in 22 the Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portion of the case. Attached hereto as 23 Exhibit C are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts 24 agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. 25 The parties agree to the payment of $23,110.59 to resolve all fees and costs incurred 26 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for fees work. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are charts 27 setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the 28 parties to settle these claims. [4151525.1] Case No. C94 2307 CW 2 STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER 2022 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 3 of 28 1 The parties agree to the payment of $26,767.75 to resolve all fees and costs incurred 2 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for litigation activities in the appeal of the RJD Order, 3 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 20-16921. Attached hereto as Exhibit E are 4 charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by 5 the parties to settle these claims. 6 The parties agree to the payment of $5,544.00 to resolve all fees and costs incurred 7 during the Second Quarter of 2022, for litigation activities in the appeal of the Five Prisons 8 Order, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 21-15614. Attached hereto as Exhibit F 9 are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to 10 by the parties to settle these claims. 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amounts set forth above are due and 12 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees 13 and costs will run from August 22, 2022, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 14 § 1961. 15 16 DATED: September 12, 2022 17 Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 18 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / [4151525.1] Case No. C94 2307 CW 3 STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER 2022 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 4 of 28 1 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3 4 DATED: September 6, 2022 5 6 /s/Sharon Garske Sharon Garske Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants 7 8 DATED: September 6, 2022 9 10 /s/Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP Attorney for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [4151525.1] Case No. C94 2307 CW 4 STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER 2022 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 5 of 28 E,XHIBIT A Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 6 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 Aprif '1,2022 through June 30,2022 CDCR/AOAP SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER CDCR/AOAP MONITORING UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $2,247,921.64 $79,938.23 TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $2,327,859.87 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 7 of 28 Armstrong v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 Mafter: CDCR/AOAP Monitoring/Merits Actual Monitoring (581-3) Claimed Rates HoursHours ROSEN, BIEN, GALVAN & GRUNFELD MichaelW Bien (M\ ,8) 16.00 74.40 0.5 15.40 74.40 o.2 369.40 233.30 369.30 230.30 0.00 Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Ernest Galvan (EG) Penny Godbold (PG) Thomas Nolan (TN) Jenny S. Yelin (JY) Michael L. Freedman (MLF) $575 03.1 0 $500 $425 $400 $400 $375 $375 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $260 $260 $51,550.00 $22,992.s0 $260 $37,31 0.00 5.40 Greg Gonzalez (GzG) Nathalie welch (NW 54.10 43.30 0.00 0.00 5.50 10.20 24s.10 242.80 27.OO 23.90 302.'10 0.00 344.00 98.80 14.70 1 87.50 5.00 41.50 20.50 147.10 14.60 275.60 8.80 21.70 290.00 Total 1 7.10 1.90 1 Zoe Cullison-Shimada (zS) lsabel Ting (lT) $0.00 $'t 13,475.00 $36,902.50 $1 34,81 0.00 4.90 55.10 43.80 o.20 Kelly Mu (KM) Hannah Potter (HP) $284,361.00 $182,872.59 $0,00 $650 $675 '103.30 Sarah A. Corkum (SAC) $295,440.00 $1 89,997.50 207.40 Hannah Chartoff (HC) Karen Stilber (KES) Linda Woo (LHW F. Gail LaPuria (FGL) Teya Khalil (TK) $20,751.50 $71,610.00 $1 82.88 219.40 4.90 Rebecca Berman (RB) Adam Dean (AD) Sanjana Srinivasan (SS) Yesi Murillo (YM) Ellen T. Brancart (ETB) $21,560.00 $74,400.00 $l 90.00 5'1.70 58.50 Jack Gleiberman (JG) Ellinor Hewood (EH) Morgan Botelle (MB) Fely F. Villadelgado (FFV) $1,400 $1,000 $950 $800 $825 $750 $7s0 $725 Total 151.30 50.90 't Ben Bien-Kahn (BBK) Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ) Michael S. Nunez (MSN) Priyah Kaul (PK) Eric Monek Anderson (EMA) 0.1 0 54.00 Fees Now Owlng Based On Negotlated Compromlse 2022 Hours: 3,150.90 13.40 187.sO 0.00 35.10 20.10 143.50 14.60 262.40 0.00 21.40 258.90 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 822,342.50 $2,81 7.50 7,320.00 $1 $1 09,21 9.69 $35,518.66 $'129,754.63 $21,504.66 $2,711.84 $49,616.88 $22,',|30.28 $1 6,670.50 $0.00 $0.00 $1,985.1 6 $0.00 $0.00 $2,062.s0 $3,060.00 $2,945.25 $72,840.00 $70,1 08.50 $7,1 70.00 $90,630.00 $0.00 $4,020.00 $6,901.13 $87,231.38 $0.00 $3,869.25 $56,250.00 $54,140.63 $0.00 $0.00 $9,126.00 $5,226.00 $8,783.78 $5,030.03 $35,91 0.88 $3,796.00 $68,224.OO $0.00 $5,564.00 $67,31 4.00 $3,653.65 $65,665.60 $0,00 $5,355.35 $64,789.73 2,879.10 $1,416,390.00 RBGG FEES: $1,363,275.38 PRISON LAW OFFICE 6.90 6.90 1.40 't91.70 1.40 191.70 66.90 267.AO Patrick Booth (PB) 18.60 267.80 172.40 Amber Norris (AN) 120.40 Claudia Cesena (CS) Tania Amarillas (TA) Gabriela Pelsinger (GP) Skye Lovett (SL) 119.70 Donald Specter (DS) Sara Norman (SN) Rita Lomio (RL) Margot Mendelson (MM) Tess Borden (TB) Jacob Hutt (JH) 351.40 112.20 376.80 46.60 Alondra Diaz-Saavedra $1,100 $900 $725 $'138,982.50 66.90 $700 $46,830.00 $45,073.88 18.60 $10,230.00 $127,205.OO 172.40 $550 $475 $400 $68,960.00 $9,846.38 $122,434.81 $66,374.00 120.40 $400 $48,160.00 $46,354.00 119.70 351.40 $400 $47,880.00 $1 22,990.00 $39,270.00 $46,084.50 $'1'18,377.88 $37,797.38 $117,867.75 $l 3,455.75 112.20 376.80 46.60 109.80 56.80 44.50 104.80 19.50 1 09.80 56.80 44.50 Juliette Mueller (Jli) Katherine Hong (KH) Korbin F€lder (KF) 13. 10 13.'10 7.90 '1.10 7.90 1.10 Michael Brodheim Sophie Mishara (SN4) 0.50 0.50 AudrBy Lim (AL) Dewi Zarni (DZ) llian Meza Pena (lP) lsabela Avila Breach (lAB) Joanna Cardenas (JC) 1 04.80 '19.50 Total Hours: 52.30 2,263.10 $350 $350 $325 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $7,590.00 $1,260.00 $122,460.00 $1 3,980.00 $31,440.00 $5,850.00 $7,305.38 $1,2',12.75 $1 33,770.66 $30,261.00 $5,630.63 $32,940.00 $31,704.7s 7,040.00 $13,350.00 $16,401.00 $ 1 2,849.38 $1 $330.00 $3,782.63 $2,281.13 $31 7.63 $150.00 5,690.00 $144.38 $15,101.63 8,887.50 1884,429.22 $3,930.00 $2,370.00 $1 2,263.10 PLO FEES: $91 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND Case Clerk (H. Min) Total Hours: DREDF FEES: 1.10 '1.'10 1.10 1.10 $205 $225.sO $217.O4 $225.50 9217.04 TOTAL CDCR/AOAP MONITORING FEES: $2,335,503.00 $2,247,921.64 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 8 of 28 Armstrong v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement ot 2022 April '1, 2022 through June 30,2022 Costs Matter: CDCR(AOAP Merits/Monitori ns Costs Now Owing Based on Negotiated Costs Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld (581-3) Photocopying (ln house) Photocopying/printing (Outside) Expert Services Transcription and Translation Online Research - PACER, Westlaw, State courts Postage & Delivery Compromise $1,693.60 $2,069.21 $42,600.35 $490.1 4 $41,002.84 $382.98 $368.62 $1,038.34 $999'40 $5'78 $6.00 Telephone Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Total RBGG Costs $1,630.09 $2,149.83 $471.76 $12,416.90 $11,951.27 $60,778.14 $58,498.96 Prison Law Office lnterpreting/SLl/Translation services Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Postage & Delivery $3,817.49 $3,674.33 $'t7,384.84 $16,732.91 $974.94 Total PLO Gosts: $22,177.27 $938.38 $21,345.62 Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, lnc. $77.00 Photocopying (in-house) $80.00 Postage & Delivery $17.30 $16.65 Tota!DREDF Costs: $97.30 $e3.65 TOTAL CLAIMED CDCRYAOAP MERITS/MONITORING GOSTS: $83,052.71 $79,938.23 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 9 of 28 EXHIBIT B Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 10 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsqno Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1,2022 through June 30,2022 BPH SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER BPH UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $132,'136.81 $4.3e TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $132,141.20 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 11 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022 through June 30,2Q22 Matter: BPH Actual BPH (581-4) Claimed Hours Hours 2022 Rates Total Fees Now Owing Based On Neootiated Compromise BPH MONITORING (581.4) ROSEN, BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD 1.50 Michael W. Bien (MWB) Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) 5.5 49.80 2.00 Thomas Nolan (TN) Penny Godbold (PG) Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK) Michael S. Nunez (MSN) Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ)39.10 Karen E. Stilber (KES) Nathalie Welch (NW) Adam Dean (AD) 0.10 49.80 3.80 58.90 9.60 Total Hours: 220.10 1.50 5.5 47.50 2.00 0.00 25.50 37.90 3.80 57.70 9.60 191 .00 $1,400 $2,1 00.00 $1,000 $825 $800 $5,500.00 $39,1 87.50 $725 $675 $650 $400 $300 $300 RBGG FEES: $1,600.00 $0.00 $'17,212.50 $24,635.00 $1,520.00 $17,310.00 $2,880.00 $2,021.25 $5,293.75 $37,717.97 $1,540.00 $0.00 $16,567.03 $23,711.19 $1,463.00 $16,660.88 $2,772.00 $111,945.00 $107,747.06 $360.00 $1,232.50 $19,040.00 $1,430.00 $3,277.50 $346.50 ,186.28 $18,326.00 $1,376.38 $3,154.59 $25,340.00 $24,389.75 $137,285.00 $132,136.81 PRISON LAW OFFICE Sara Norman (SN) Rita Lomio (RL) Rana Anabtawi (RA) Tess Borden (TB) Jacob Hutt (JH) Total Hours: PLO FEES TOTAL FEES FOR BPH WORK: 0.40 1.70 27.20 2.60 6.9 0.40 1.70 27.20 2.60 6.9 38.80 38.80 $900 $725 $700 $550 $475 $1 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 12 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement o12022 April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022 Costs Matter: BPH Costs Now Owing Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581'4) Based on Nesotiated Costs Photocopying (ln house) Postage and delivery Compromise $2.60 $2'50 $1.96 $1.89 Total RBGG Costs $4.56 $4'39 TOTAL CLAIMED BPH GOSTS: $4.56 $4.39 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 13 of 28 EXHIBIT C Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 14 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1,2022 through June 30,2022 DAPO SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER DAPO MONITORING UNDISPUTED FEES UNDISPUTED COST $174,413.18 $1,083.67 TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $175,496.85 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 15 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April'1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 M alTer : D A P O M on itori n g Actual DAPO Monitorino (581 -9) Claimed Hours Hours Fees Now Owing Based On Neqotiated Compromise 2022 Rates Total ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD Michael W. Bien (MWB) Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Penny Godbold (PG) 0.60 7.30 9.40 13.30 75.30 Thomas Nolan (TN) Benjamin Bien-Kahn (BBK) Caroline E. Jackson (CEJ)30.20 Priyah Kaul (PK) Eric Monek Anderson (EMA) Hannah Chartoff (HC) Fely F. Villadelgado (FFV) Nathalie Welch (NCW) Rebecca Berman (RB) Jack Gleiberman (JG) Sarah A. Corkum (SAC) lsabel Ting (lT) Adam Dean (AD) 11.80 11.80 13.50 2.00 204.60 3.90 8.10 21.10 0.20 0.30 Total Hours: RBGG FEES: TOTAL FOR DAPO MONITORING WORK: 413.40 0.00 7.30 9.40 13.30 72.90 29.70 11.40 11.80 13.50 0.00 191.60 0.00 7.00 21 .10 0.00 0.00 $1,400 $1,000 $800 $825 $725 $0.00 $0.00 $7,300.00 $7,520.00 $10,972.50 $7,026.25 $650 $52,852.50 $19,305.00 $575 $500 $425 $300 $6,555.00 $5,900.00 $5,737.50 $0.00 $300 $300 $300 $260 $260 $57,480.00 $0.00 $300 $2,100.00 $5,486.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,238.00 $10,561.03 $50,870.53 $18,581.06 $6,309.19 $5,678.75 $5,522.34 $0.00 $55,324.50 $0.00 $2,021.25 $5,280.28 $0.00 $0.00 389.00 $181,208.50 $174,413.18 $181,208.50 $174,413.18 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 16 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022 Costs Matter: DAPO Monitoring Costs Now Owing Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-9) Based on NePotiated Costs Photocopying (in-house) Postage & Delivery Long distance and videophone charges Travel - Mileage, Tolls, Food Compromise $255.80 $246.21 $87.77 $84.48 $0.1 0 $0'10 $782.22 $752.89 TotalRBGG Costs: $1,125.89 $1,083.67 TOTAL CLAIMED DAPO MONITORING COSTS: $1,125.89 $1,083.67 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 17 of 28 E ) ) IT I} Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 18 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1,2022 through June 30,2022 SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES WORK AND COSTS UNDISPUTED FEES WORK (ALL MATTERS) FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $22,989.31 $121.28 TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $23,110.59 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 19 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April '1, 2022 through June 30,2O22 Matter: AII Matters Fees Work Actual Fees (581-2) 2022 Claimed Hours Hours Rates Total Fees Now Owing Based On Neqotiated Compromise ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Ernest Galvan (EG) Karen E. Stilber (KES) Morgan Botelle (MKB) Total Hours: 14.50 14.50 0.40 11.60 0.40 1 1.60 0.20 0.00 26.70 26.50 $1,000 $950 $400 $300 RBGG FEES: $14,500.00 $380.00 $13,956.25 $365.75 $4,640.00 $0.00 $4,466.00 $0.00 $19,520.00 $18,788.00 $1,820.00 $1,600.00 $1,751.75 $1,540.00 $3,420.00 $3,291.75 $945.00 $909.56 $945.00 $e09.56 $23,885.00 $22,989.31 PRISON LAW OFFICE Margot Mendelson (MKM) Ashley Kirby (AK) Total Hours 2.60 6.40 9.00 2.60 $700 6.40 9.00 $250 PLO FEES: DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND Linda Kilb (LDK) Total Hours: DREDF FEES: TOTAL FEES FOR ARMSTRONG FEES WORK: 1.00 1.00 00 00 $945 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 20 of 28 Armstronq v, Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1,2022 through June 30,2022 Gosts Matter: Fees Work in All Matters Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-2) Costs Now Owing Based on Negotiated Costs Compromise $86.00 Photocopying and Printing (in-house) Postage & Delivery TotalRBGG Costs: TOTAL CLAIMED FEES WORK GOSTS : s82.78 $40.00 S38'so $126.00 $121.28 $126.00 $121.28 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 21 of 28 EXHIBIT E Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 22 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1,2022through June 30,2022 APPEAL OF RJD ORDER SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS MATTER APPEAL OF RJD ORDER UNDISPU TED FEES UNDISPUTED COSTS $26,560.19 $207.56 TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $26,767.75 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 23 of 28 Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022through June 30,2022 Matter: Appeal of RJD Order Fees (581-191 Actual Claimed Hours Hours 2022 Rates Total Fees Now Owing Based On Neqotiated Comoromise ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Michael L. Freedman (MLF) Hanna Chartoff (HC) Karen E. Stilber (KES) RBGG Fees: TOTAL FEES FOR APPEAL OF RJD ORDER: 3.00 3.00 32.20 0.20 0.90 32.20 0.20 0.90 36.30 36.30 $2,887.50 $1,000 $750 $3,000.00 $24,150.00 $23,244.38 $425 $85.00 $360.00 $346.50 $27,595.00 $26,560.19 $27,595.00 $26,560.19 $400 $81.81 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 24 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022 Costs Matter: Appeal of RJD Order Costs Now Owing Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-19) Gosts Westlaw research TotalRBGG Gosts Based on Neeotiated Compromise $215.65 $207.56 $215.65 $207.56 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 25 of 28 EXHTBIT F Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 26 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement ol 2022 April 1,2022 through June 30,2022 APPEAL OF 5 PRISONS ORDER SUMMARY OF UNDISPUTED FEES AND COSTS UNDISPUTED FEES MATTER APPEAL OF 5 PRISONS ORDER UNDISPUTED COSTS $5,274.50 $269.50 TOTAL UNDISPUTED: $5,544.00 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 27 of 28 Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022 through June 30,2022 Matter: Appeal of 5PR/SOilS Order Fees (581-20) Actual Claimed Hours Hours Fees Now Owing Based On Neqotiated Compromise 2022 Rates Total ROSEN. BIEN. GALVAN & GRUNFELD Michael W. Bien (MWB) Gay C. Grunfeld (GCG) Karen E. Stilber (KES) TOTAL FEES FOR APPEAL OF 5 PRISONS ORDER: 0.5 0.5 4.30 1.20 4.30 1.20 5.50 5.50 $1,400 $1,000 $400 $5,480.00 $673.75 $4,138.75 $462.00 $5,274.50 $5,480.00 $5,274.50 $700 $4,300.00 $480.00 Case 4:94-cv-02307-CW Document 3429 Filed 09/12/22 Page 28 of 28 Armstronq v. Newsom Second Quarterly Statement of 2022 April 1, 2022through June 30,2022 Gosts Matter: Appeal of Five Prisons Order Costs Now Owing Rosen. Bien. Galvan & Grunfeld (581-20) Costs ln house copying and printing TotalRBGG Costs: Based on Nesotiated Compromise $280.00 $269.50 $280.00 $269.50

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?