Ervin v. Ayers
Filing
177
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 176 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010)
Ervin v. Ayers
Doc. 177
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CURTIS LEE ERVIN,
) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) VINCENT CULLEN, Acting Warden of ) San Quentin State Prison, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ )
Case No. 4-0-cv-1228-CW ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY, AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER Death Penalty Case
Pursuant to Petitioner's unopposed motion, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to complete discovery is extended until April 1, 2011. The Court's scheduling order of August 6, 2010, is further amended as follows: 1. Respondent shall move for summary judgment on or before July 1, 2011. 2. Petitioner shall oppose Respondent's motion within 90 days. In the same brief, Petitioner may also cross-move for summary judgment, and/or move for an evidentiary hearing. 3. In a single brief, Respondent shall reply to Petitioner's opposition and oppose Petitioner's motions, if any, within 45 days. 4. Petitioner shall reply to Respondent's opposition to any cross-motions within 30 days. 5. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court will take the motions under submission upon receipt of Petitioner's reply or expiration of the time for Petitioner to reply.
Order Extending Time For Completion Of Discovery, And Amending Scheduling Order - No. 4-0-cv-1228-CW
Dockets.Justia.com
DATED: December 22, 2010 ______________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge Submitted by: /s/ Pamala Sayasane PAMALA SAYASANE, Calif. Bar No. 185688 660 4th Street, No. 341 San Francisco, California 94107-1618 Telephone: (415) 508-1609 Facsimile: (415) 508-1630 Email: Sayasanelaw@yahoo.com Second counsel for Petitioner
Order Extending Time For Completion Of Discovery, And Amending Scheduling Order - No. 4-0-cv-1228-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?