Ervin v. Ayers
Filing
252
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 250 Motion to File 249 Amended Opposition to State's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
Curtis Lee ERVIN,
Petitioner,
13
DEATH-PENALTY CASE
v.
14
15
Case Number 4-0-cv-1228-CW
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION TO AMEND
Kevin CHAPPELL,1 Acting Warden of
San Quentin State Prison,
16
[Doc. No. 250]
Respondent.
17
18
Petitioner timely filed his Opposition to State’s Motion for
19
Summary Judgment and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing.
20
248.)
21
typographical and other minor errors.
22
(Doc. No.
Petitioner moves to amend this brief to correct
(Doc. No. 250.)
Good cause appearing therefor, the Court grants Petitioner’s
23
Motion, and deems the original brief, (Doc. No. 248), withdrawn,
24
and the amended brief, (Doc. No. 249), timely filed as of the
25
date the present Order is posted; the Clerk shall correct the
26
docket accordingly.
Pursuant to the Court’s Order Amending Post-
27
28
1
Respondent’s name is correctly spelled as indicated here.
Clerk shall correct the docket accordingly.
The
1
Discovery Case Schedule, (Doc. No. 199), Respondent’s
2
reply/opposition brief is due within forty-five days from the
3
date the present Order is posted, and Petitioner’s reply brief is
4
due within thirty days from the date that Respondent’s
5
reply/opposition brief is filed.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:
14
January _____, 2013
__________________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?