Ervin v. Ayers
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 260 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 213 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/10/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CURTIS LEE ERVIN,
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,
Case No. 4-0-CV-1228-CW
ORDER GRANTING 30-DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
Death Penalty Case
Pursuant to the motion of Petitioner, and good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for filing Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s op-
position to its evidentiary hearing motion is enlarged 30 days, to and including, July 10, 2013.
United States District Judge
/s/ Pamala Sayasane
Law Office of Pamala Sayasane
660 4th Street, No. 341
San Francisco, California 94107
Second counsel for Petitioner,
Curtis Lee Ervin
Order Granting 30-Day Extension Of Time To File Reply To Opposition To Evidentiary Hearing Motion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?