Ervin v. Ayers

Filing 261

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 260 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 213 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/10/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CURTIS LEE ERVIN,

5

Petitioner,

6

vs.
7
8

KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,

9
10

Respondent.
___________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4-0-CV-1228-CW
ORDER GRANTING 30-DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
MOTION [Proposed]

Death Penalty Case

11
12

Pursuant to the motion of Petitioner, and good cause appearing therefore,

13

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for filing Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s op-

14

position to its evidentiary hearing motion is enlarged 30 days, to and including, July 10, 2013.

15
16

6/11/2013
DATED: ________________

17

____________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

18
19
20

Submitted by:

21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Pamala Sayasane
Law Office of Pamala Sayasane
660 4th Street, No. 341
San Francisco, California 94107
Second counsel for Petitioner,
Curtis Lee Ervin

26
27
28

1.
Order Granting 30-Day Extension Of Time To File Reply To Opposition To Evidentiary Hearing Motion

No. 4-0-cv-1228-CW