Ervin v. Ayers
Filing
265
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 264 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Replies due by 8/16/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CURTIS LEE ERVIN,
)
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs.
)
)
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of Cali- )
fornia State Prison at San Quentin,
)
)
Respondent. )
___________________________________ )
Case No. 4-0-CV-1228-CW
ORDER GRANTING 7-DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
MOTION [Proposed]
Death Penalty Case
11
12
Pursuant to the motion of Petitioner, and good cause appearing therefore,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for filing Petitioner’s reply to Respondent’s op-
14
position to the evidentiary hearing motion is enlarged seven days, to and including August 16,
15
2013.
16
17
12
DATED: August ____, 2013
18
____________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
19
20
21
Submitted by:
22
23
24
25
26
/s/ Pamala Sayasane
PAMALA SAYASANE, Calif. Bar No. 185688
660 4th Street, No. 341
San Francisco, California 94107
Second counsel for Petitioner,
Curtis Lee Ervin
27
28
Order Granting 7-Day Extension Of Time To File Reply
To Opposition To Evidentiary Hearing Motion
No. 4-0-cv-1228-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?