Quan v. USA

Filing 46

ORDER re 39 application to renew judgment lien. Plaintiff file a response to the governments reply no later than one week from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on September 16, 2022. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TO HA QUAN, v. 9 10 ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 01-cv-00435-PJH Plaintiff, 8 12 13 Before the court is the government’s application for renewal of judgment lien. 14 15 Plaintiff opposes the application on the basis that there exists no abstract of judgment 16 and thus no judgment lien to renew. Dkt. 41. To the contrary, the government provides a 17 copy of the existing, recorded abstract of judgment in support of its reply brief. Dkt. 44-1. 18 The abstract of judgment reflects that judgment was entered on October 16, 2002, and 19 that the abstract was issued on February 13, 2003. The issuance of the abstract on that 20 date is reflected on the court’s internal docket as well. Dkt. 36. The existence of an abstract of judgment appears dispositive to this application, 21 22 and it appears that Quan’s counsel did not possess a copy of the abstract of judgment at 23 the time the opposition brief was filed. Therefore, plaintiff may file a response to the 24 government’s reply. The response may not exceed four (4) pages, and it must be filed 25 within one week from the date of this order. 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: September 16, 2022 3 4 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?