Plata et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
3721
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR MANDATORY VACCINATION. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 27, 2021. (jstlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2021)
Case 4:01-cv-01351-JST Document 3721 Filed 10/27/21 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARCIANO PLATA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 01-cv-01351-JST
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR
MANDATORY VACCINATION
v.
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
On September 27, 2021, the Court ordered mandatory vaccination of certain persons and
14
required Defendants and the Receiver to submit an implementation plan, including a deadline by
15
which all covered persons must be vaccinated, by October 12, 2021. ECF No. 3684. Defendants
16
and the Receiver jointly filed the required plan with a deadline for covered persons to be fully
17
vaccinated by November 29, 2021. ECF No. 3694. Defendants subsequently indicated some
18
confusion over whether the deadline was as stated in the filed plan, explaining that they had
19
requested a December 20, 2021 deadline to which the Receiver did not agree. ECF No. 3703. The
20
Court ordered Defendants to meet and confer to attempt to resolve any dispute that might exist
21
over the implementation deadline. ECF No. 3705.
22
The Receiver has now requested an order setting a specific implementation deadline. ECF
23
No. 3708. The Court has reviewed the Receiver’s and Plaintiffs’ filings in support of such an
24
order, and Defendants’ and Intervenor California Correctional Peace Officers’ Association’s
25
filings in opposition. ECF Nos. 3707-08, 3710-13, 3720.
26
In light of the compelling public health considerations underlying the vaccination order, as
27
well as the significant passage of time – thirty days since the Court issued its order – without any
28
apparent action aside from the October 12 joint filing of an implementation plan, the Court agrees
Case 4:01-cv-01351-JST Document 3721 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 3
1
with the Receiver that it is appropriate to set a specific vaccination deadline at this time.1 The
2
Court now orders that full vaccination of the persons covered by the September 27, 2021 order
3
occur no later than January 12, 2022.
Without deciding whether Defendants are required to meet and confer with CCPOA and
4
5
other unions, the Court notes that this deadline allows ample time for such meeting and conferring.
6
Defendants contend that they require 60 days to meet and confer with various unions, e.g., ECF
7
No. 3720-1 at 4, and CCPOA has argued that “a minimum period of six weeks . . . before any
8
mandate takes effect” would be appropriate. ECF No. 3669 at 11. In addition, recent orders of the
9
California Department of Public Health have required full vaccination in ten or eleven weeks from
the date the mandates have been announced. ECF No. 3663-1 at 260-61 (August 5, 2021 CDPH
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
order requiring first dose of one-dose regimen or second dose of two-dose regimen by
12
September 30, 2021 – eight weeks later2); id. at 270 (August 19, 2021 CDPH order requiring first
13
dose of one-dose regimen or second dose of two-dose regimen by October 14, 2021 – again, eight
14
weeks later); CDPH, Order of the State Public Health Officer re: Adult Care Facilities and Direct
15
Care Worker Vaccine Requirement, https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/
16
COVID-19/Order-of-the-State-Public-Health-Officer-Adult-Care-Facilities-and-Direct-Care-
17
Worker-Vaccine-Requirement.aspx (September 28, 2021 CDPH order requiring first dose of one-
18
dose regimen or second dose of two-dose regimen by November 30, 2021 – nine weeks later).
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
On October 25, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to stay the Court’s September 27, 2021 order.
ECF No. 3715. There has yet been no opportunity to oppose the motion, which the Court will
consider once it is ripe. The Court will discuss a briefing and hearing schedule on Defendants’
motion to stay at tomorrow’s case management conference.
2
A person is considered fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving either of these doses. CDPH,
Order of the State Public Health Officer re: Health Care Worker Protections in High-Risk
Settings (July 26, 2021), https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/Orderof-the-State-Public-Health-Officer-Unvaccinated-Workers-In-High-Risk-Settings.aspx.
2
Case 4:01-cv-01351-JST Document 3721 Filed 10/27/21 Page 3 of 3
1
A January 12, 2022 deadline is eleven weeks from the date of this order, and more than fifteen
2
weeks since the Court ordered mandatory vaccination on September 27, 2021.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 27, 2021
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?