Ly v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 11 Ex Parte MOTION to Reopen CaseEx Parte MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. Responses due by 10/11/2011. Replies due by 10/18/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OAKLAND DIVISION 7 LEN S. LY, Case No: C 01-2296 SBA 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE vs. Dkt. 11 10 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s Ex 15 Parte Motion for Reopening and Request for Entry of Judgment (Dkt. 11) by no later than 16 October 11, 2011. The failure to file a response to the motion will be deemed to be a 17 consent to the granting of Defendant’s motion. If Plaintiff timely files an opposition, 18 Defendant may submit a reply by no later than October 18, 2011. The matter will be taken 19 under submission as of the date the reply is due. There will be no hearing on the motion 20 unless otherwise ordered. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2011 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?