Shum v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 661

ORDER re 660 Stipulation filed by Frank T. Shum, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 660 Stipulation filed by Frank T. Shum. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2008)

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ

Document 660

Filed 09/22/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP MARK T. JANSEN (State Bar No. 114896) PAUL F. KIRSCH (State Bar No. 127446) ANGUS M. MACDONALD (State Bar No. 212526) TALI L. ALBAN (State Bar No. 233694) Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK T. SHUM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION FRANK T. SHUM, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, JEAN-MARC VERDIELL, and LIGHTLOGIC, INC., Defendants. Case No. C02-3262 DLJ (EMC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS

/// /// /// /// /// /// ///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS CASE NO.C02-3262 DLJ (EMC)

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ

Document 660

Filed 09/22/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2008;

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2008 Defendant Intel Corporation ("Intel") produced a privilege log, and on September 18, 2008, Intel produced additional documents; WHEREAS, based on Intel's privilege log and September 18, 2008 document production, Plaintiff Frank T. Shum ("Shum") filed a Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents on September, 19, 2008; WHEREAS, by this Court's September 9, 2008 Order, trial is set to begin on November 10,

WHEREAS, counsel for Shum and counsel for Defendants agree that it is desirable to dispose of discovery issues as quickly as practicable; WHEREAS, counsel for Shum and counsel for Defendants agree that: (1) the date for Defendants to serve their opposition to Shum's Motion to Compel shall be September 29, 2008; (2) the date for Shum to serve his reply in support of his Motion to Compel shall be October 3, 2008; and (3) the hearing on the Motion to Compel shall take place on October 8, 2008, or such other day as may be acceptable to the Court; WHEREAS, the parties agree that Shum may supplement his trial exhibit list should additional documents be produced as a result of the hearing and order of the Court. Such supplementation is limited to newly-produced documents (if any) and must be completed within 3 days of Shum's receipt of such documents; WHEREAS, allowing the shortening of the briefing and hearing deadlines on Shum's Motion to Compel as set forth immediately above will not affect any of the other pretrial dates, including the November 10, 2008 trial date set; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among Shum and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff Frank T. Shum's Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents shall be filed on September 29, 2008, 2 Shum's reply in support of said Motion shall be filed on October 3, 2008, and the hearing on the Motion shall be on October 8, 2008.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS CASE NO.C02-3262 DLJ (EMC)

2

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ

Document 660

Filed 09/22/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS CASE NO.C02-3262 DLJ (EMC)

DATED: September 22, 2008

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ Tali L. Alban TALI L. ALBAN Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK T. SHUM

DATED: September 22, 2008

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, INC. By: /s/ Jayesh Hines-Shah JAYESH HINES-SHAH Attorneys for Defendants INTEL CORPORATION, LIGHTLOGIC, INC. and JEAN-MARC VERDIELL

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. September 23, 2008 (modified) HON. EDWARD M. CHEN MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DATED:

3

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ

Document 660

Filed 09/22/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION I, Tali L. Alban, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jayesh Hines-Shah has concurred in this filing. /s/ Tali L. Alban TALI L. ALBAN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFF FRANK T. SHUM'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS CASE NO.C02-3262 DLJ (EMC)

4