Hamilton v. Hernandez et al

Filing 62

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 60 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. R. J. HERNANDEZ, Chief Deputy Warden, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 02-5602 SBA (PR) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE FROM REPRESENTING DEFENDANTS (Docket no. 60) Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to disqualify the California Attorney General's Office from representing Defendants in this action (docket no. 60). Plaintiff claims that the "[California] Attorney General and his office, is [sic] in fact, in an unlawful conspiracy with his CDCR-clients, with evil motive and intent, to obstruct justice and place Plaintiff in a litigation disadvantage." (Mot. to Disqualify at 5.) The State has a mandatory duty to represent the State and any state officer acting in an official capacity. See Cal. Gov't Code § 12512 ("The Attorney General shall . . . defend all causes to which the State, or any State officer is a party in his official capacity . . . ."). In representing the State, the Attorney General will also normally represent the public interest. See, e.g., D'Amico v. Bd. of Med. Exam'r, 11 Cal. 3d 1, 14-15 (1974). In an exceptional case, the Attorney General may recognize a conflict of interest between the duty to represent the public interest and the duty to represent a state agency. "However, unless the Attorney General asserts the existence of such a conflict, it must be concluded that the actions and determinations of the Attorney General in such a lawsuit are made both a representative of the public interest and as counsel for the state agency or officer." D'Amico, 11 Cal. 3d at 15. In the instant case, the California Attorney General's Office has not asserted any conflict of interest. Furthermore, the Court finds that the instant case does not present an exceptional case that would require disqualification. It is exceedingly common for state prisoners to file civil rights actions against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and its employees based 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on constitutional grounds. These cases do not present the type of "public interest" case which would normally invoke a potential conflict of interest. Finally, actions taken by the Attorney General on behalf of state employees do not present a conflict of interest for an opposing party. Therefore, the Court finds no merit to Plaintiff's claim that the representation of Defendants by the California Attorney General's Office presents a conflict of interest. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to disqualify the California Attorney General's Office from representing Defendants (docket no. 60) is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket no. 60. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/16/08 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge P:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.02\Hamilton5602.DENYdisqualifyAG.frm 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. HERNANDEZ et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV02-05602 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 17, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. George Hamilton K-54885 Kern Valley State Prison P.O. Box 5104 Delano, CA 93216 Dated: September 17, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk P:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.02\Hamilton5602.DENYdisqualifyAG.frm 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?