Moeller et al v. Taco Bell Corp.

Filing 710

ORDER re 709 Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 01/22/2013. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

FRANCIE E. MOELLER, and others,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

v.

Case No. 02-cv-05849 PJH (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Re: Dkt. No. 709

TACO BELL CORP.,
Defendant.

16
17
18

On January 22, 2013, plaintiffs filed a discovery letter brief requesting a protective

19 order prohibiting certain depositions and requesting the Court to compel production of
20 discovery from defendant Taco Bell. Although the parties apparently conferred by phone,
21 plaintiffs unilaterally filed a four page brief that does not describe Taco Bell’s positions or
22 proposed compromises regarding these issues. Accordingly, Taco Bell must submit a letter
23 brief of no more than four pages responding to plaintiffs’ letter brief by January 25, 2013 at
24 5:00 p.m.
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Date: January 22, 2013

27
28
Case No. 02-cv-05849 PJH (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge