Moeller et al v. Taco Bell Corp.

Filing 710

ORDER re 709 Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 01/22/2013. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 FRANCIE E. MOELLER, and others, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. Case No. 02-cv-05849 PJH (NC) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE Re: Dkt. No. 709 TACO BELL CORP., Defendant. 16 17 18 On January 22, 2013, plaintiffs filed a discovery letter brief requesting a protective 19 order prohibiting certain depositions and requesting the Court to compel production of 20 discovery from defendant Taco Bell. Although the parties apparently conferred by phone, 21 plaintiffs unilaterally filed a four page brief that does not describe Taco Bell’s positions or 22 proposed compromises regarding these issues. Accordingly, Taco Bell must submit a letter 23 brief of no more than four pages responding to plaintiffs’ letter brief by January 25, 2013 at 24 5:00 p.m. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Date: January 22, 2013 27 28 Case No. 02-cv-05849 PJH (NC) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?