Verizon California Inc. v. Peevey et al
Filing
85
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/15/06. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2006)
Verizon California Inc. v. Peevey et al
Doc. 85
Case 4:03-cv-03441-CW
Document 85
Filed 09/14/2006
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL R. PEEVEY, et al., Defendants. PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC, Counterclaimant, v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Counterdefendant. / / ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE No. C 03-3441 CW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff Verizon California, Inc. appealed this Court's decision that the Commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission's decision was not arbitrary or capricious. See June 17, 2004 Order The Ninth Circuit
Resolving Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment.
affirmed all the Court's rulings, except for the Court's ruling on
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 4:03-cv-03441-CW
Document 85
Filed 09/14/2006
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
calls to paging customers.
Verizon California, Inc. v. Peevey, __ As to that issue,
F.3d ___, 2006 WL 2563879, *1 (9th Cir. 2006). the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.
Defendants Michael R. Peevey, Loretta M. Lynch, Carl W. Woods, Goeffrey F. Brown and Susan P. Kennedy, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, are ordered to file a brief, by October 6, 2006, on whether more briefing in this case is necessary or whether the Court should remand this case, and the outstanding calls to paging customers issue, to the CPUC. Plaintiff and Counterclaimant Pac-
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
West Telecomm, In. may file a response within one week of Defendants' brief. If the mandate has not issued by October 6,
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2006, Defendants shall submit their brief one week after the mandate is issued; Plaintiff and Counterclaimant will continue to have a week to file their responses. The Court will review the parties' papers and issue an order. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
9/14/06 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?