Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco et al
Filing
611
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Denying 608 Motion to Relate Case. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
DANIEL PURCELL- #191424
dpurcell@kvn.com
ERIC H. MacMICHAEL- #231697
emacmichael@kvn.com
REBEKAH L. PUNAK- #248588
rpunank@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
7
Attorneys for Third Party
CARAMAD CONLEY
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
JOHN TENNISON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
DEPARTMENT; PRENTICE EARL
SANDERS, and NAPOLEON HENDRIX,
Case No. C 04-00574 CW
Consolidated with
Case No. C 04-01643 CW
ORDER O N ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
BE RELATED
18
Defendants.
19
20
CARAMAD CONLEY,
Case No. C 12-00454-JCS
21
Plaintiff,
22
23
v.
24
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
25
FRANCISCO; PRENTICE EARL SANDERS,
26
Defendants,
27
28
625204.01
ORDER O N ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CASE NO. C 04-00574
CW
1
Third Party Caramad Conley ("Conley") has filed a motion to consider whether the
2
action entitled Conley v. City and County ofSan Francisco, 3:12-cv-00454-JCS, currently
3
pending before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero in this District, should be related to
4
the action formerly before this Court, entitled Tennison v. City and County of San Francisco,
5
4:04-cv-574-CW. Having carefully considered the papers on this motion, the Court declines to
6
relate the cases.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated:
3/19/2012
_
12
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
Judge of the United States District Court
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
625204.01
ORDER O N ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED CASE NO. C 04-00574
CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?