Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc., et al.
Filing
246
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN DEADLINES re 244 Letter, filed by Hill and Knowlton Inc., Nikki Pooshs, Philip Morris USA, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/30/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Stanley D. Davis (admitted pro hac vice)
sddavis@shb.com
Jennifer L. Brown (CA Bar No. 242254)
jbrown@shb.com
Randall D. Haimovici (CA Bar No. 213635)
rhaimovici@shb.com
Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, CA 94104-4505
Phone: (415) 544-1900
Fax: (415) 391-0281
Attorneys for Defendant
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
NIKKI POOSHS,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
vs.
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., et al.
Defendants.
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C 04-01221-PJH-JCS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PARTIES’ REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN
DEADLINES
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
CASE NO. C 04-01221-PJH-JCS
240575 v1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
The parties have jointly requested a one-week continuance of the deadline to file their
3
proposed joint and separate jury instructions, joint voir dire questions, and verdict forms, from
4
November 1, 2012 to November 8, 2012.
5
Good cause being shown, the Court rules that the parties’ request is GRANTED.
6
Proposed joint and separate jury instructions, joint voir dire questions, and verdict forms will
now be filed and served no later than November 8, 2012.
8
Dated: 10/30/12
12
RT
14
FO
NO
13
____________________________________________
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
n
Hamilto
hyllis J.
Judge P
H
ER
LI
11
R NIA
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
9
15
16
A
7
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
CASE NO. C 04-01221-PJH-JCS
28
240575 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?