Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service et al

Filing 141

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 140 Motion to Stay filing of Plaintiff's motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)

Case4:04-cv-04275-SBA Document140-1 Filed09/21/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

James R. Wheaton (State Bar No. 115230)
Lynne R. Saxton (State Bar No. 226210)
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATION
1736 Franklin Street, 9th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
ph [phone]
fax [phone]

11

Roger Flynn, Pro Hac Vice
Jeffrey C. Parsons, Pro Hac Vice
WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT
P.O. Box 349
412 High Street
Lyons, CO 80540
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Karuk Tribe of California

6
7
8
9
10

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
)
)
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE;
)
MARGARET BOLAND, Forest Supervisor,
)
Klamath National Forest,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
The New 49’ers, Inc. and Raymond W. Koons,
)
)
Defendant-Intervenors.
)
__________________________________________)

Civ No. 04-4275 (SBA)

[proposed] ORDER
XXXXXXXX
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO STAY THE
FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’
FEES AND COSTS

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

Proposed ORDER Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay the Filing of Plaintiff’s
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
Civ No. 04-4275 (SBA)

1

Case4:04-cv-04275-SBA Document140-1 Filed09/21/12 Page2 of 2

1
2

Having considered the Plaintiff Karuk Tribe of California’s (“Karuk Tribe”) Unopposed
Motion to Stay the Filing of Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, this Court finds as

3

follows.
4
5

The filing deadline for the Karuk Tribe’s Motion/Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

6

is stayed until sixty (60) days after the United States Supreme Court either denies the New

7

49’ers, Inc. et al.’s Certiorari Petition, or if the Certiorari Petition is granted, sixty (60) days after

8

the Supreme Court rules on the merits of the case, whichever is appropriate.
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

Date: ____________
10/23/12

____________________________________
The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Proposed ORDER Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay the Filing of Plaintiff’s
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
Civ No. 04-4275 (SBA)

2