"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
ORDER SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT. Set/Reset Deadlines as to [737-4] Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, [750-3] Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Report o f Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, dated December 20, 2013, 738 MOTION for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll [REDACTED]; 771 Apple's Objection to Supplemental Declaration of Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. Motion Hearing set for Wednesday 8/6/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/28/14. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Northern District of California
United States District Court
THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST
Case No.: 05-CV-0037 YGR
ORDER SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Now pending before the Court are: (1) the motion of defendant Apple, Inc. for summary
judgment and to exclude the expert testimony of Roger G. Noll (Dkt. No. 738); (2) plaintiffs'
Daubert motion to exclude certain opinion testimony of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel
(Dkt. No. 737-4); (3) plaintiffs’ motion to strike the December 20, 2013 supplemental expert report
of Murphy and Topel (Dkt. No. 750-3); and (4) Apple's objection pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-
3(d)(1) to the supplemental declaration of Jeffrey M. Wooldridge (Dkt. No. 771).
The Court shall hear oral argument on these matters at 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 6,
2014, in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland,
California. Each side shall be afforded no more than 90 minutes. The Court shall entertain attorney
argument only. No experts shall testify.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 28, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?