Hinman v. Fujitsu Software Corporation

Filing 146

ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 129 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting 145 Report and Recommendations as to Motion for Attorney Fees. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/8/2008: # 1 Certificate of Service) (fj, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2008 _________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge v. FUJITSU COMPUTER SYSTEMS CORP., Respondent. ___________________________________/ The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman's Report and Recommendation regarding the motion for attorney's fees filed by respondent Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation ("Fujitsu"), as well as petitioner Howard E. Hinman's objections to the report. The court finds the report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Fujitsu be awarded $133,018.01 in attorney's fees and $14,499.89 in costs, against Howard E. Hinman, Glen K. Dent, and zBatch LLC. HOWARD E. HINMAN, et al., Petitioners No. C 05-3509 PJH ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?