Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al
Filing
1103
ORDER TAKING UNDER SUBMISSION (228 in 4:12-cv-00692-CW) (1098 in 4:05-cv-04063-CW) DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF THE SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on November 16, 2012. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
TESSERA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.;
SPANSION, LLC; SPANSION, INC;
SPANSION TECHNOLOGY, INC.;
ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR
ENGINEERING, INC.; ASE (U.S.),
INC.; CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
CHIPMOS U.S.A., INC.; SILICONWARE
PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.;
SILICONWARE USA, INC.;
STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.;
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.; STATS
CHIPPAC, INC.; STATS CHIPPAC
(BVI), LTD.; and STATS CHIPPAC,
LTD.,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER TAKING UNDER
SUBMISSION
DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS TO
NONDISPOSITIVE
ORDER OF THE
SPECIAL MASTER
(Docket Nos. 1098
in Case No.
05-4063 and 228 in
Case No. 12-692)
Defendants.
________________________________/
TESSERA, INC.,
No. C 12-692 CW
Plaintiff,
17
18
No. C 05-4063 CW
v.
MOTOROLA, INC.; QUALCOMM, INC.;
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;
and ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC,
Defendants.
________________________________/
AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/
1
The Court takes under submission on the papers Defendants’
2
objections to the Special Master’s Order regarding Plaintiff’s use
3
of foreign experts (Docket Nos. 1098 in Case No. 05-4063 and 228
4
in Case No. 12-692).
5
A further written order will issue.
6
No further briefing is needed at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: November 16, 2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?