Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 1159

ORDER Granting 1158 Stipulation of Final Dismissal with Prejudice (as to STATS). Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/31/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) fred.bartlit@bartlit-beck.com Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) eric.olson@bartlit-beck.com Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) sean.grimsley@bartlit-beck.com Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP 1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl. Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303) 592-3100 Fax: (303) 592-3140 J.B. Heaton (Pro Hac Vice) jb.heaton@bartlit-beck.com Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP 54 West Hubbard Street, 3rd Fl. Chicago, IL 60654 Tel: (312) 494-4400 Fax: (312) 494-4440 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc. Matthew D. Powers (SBN 104795) matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com Steven Cherensky (SBN 168275) steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com Monica Eno (SBN 164107) monica.eno@tensegritylawgroupcom Azra Hadzimehmedovic (SBN 239088) azra@tensegritylawgroup.com Tensegrity Law Group, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: (650) 802-6000 Fax: (650) 802-6001 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant STATS ChipPAC Ltd., STATS ChipPAC, Inc., and STATS ChipPAC (BVI) Limited 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 22 23 24 Tessera, Inc., Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al., Defendants and Counterclaimants. Case No. 4:05-cv-04063-CW Stipulation and Order of Final Dismissal with Prejudice 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and 2 Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc. (“Tessera”) and Defendants and Counterclaimants STATS 3 ChipPAC Ltd., STATS ChipPAC, Inc., and STATS ChipPAC (BVI) Limited (collectively, 4 “STATS”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), that all claims and counterclaims as 5 between them in the above-captioned matter be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH 6 PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 DATED: January 30, 2013 BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 2 By: /s/ J.B. Heaton . .J.B. Heaton Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. 3 4 5 DATED: January 30, 2013 TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP, LLP By: /s/ Monica Eno 6 . Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant STATS ChipPAC Ltd., STATS ChipPAC, Inc., and STATS ChipPAC (BVI) Limited 7 8 9 10 SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: 1/31/2013 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for STATS, Monica Eno. 4 5 6 7 Dated: January 30, 2013 BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP By: /s/ J.B. Heaton . J.B. Heaton Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?