Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 1197

ORDER Granting 1196 Stipulation of Final Dismissal with Prejudice (as to SPIL). Siliconware USA Inc (a California corporation) and Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (a Republic of China corporation) are terminated. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/9/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1196 Filed05/09/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Michael F. Heafey (SBN 153499) ([e-mail])
Thomas J. Gray (SBN 191411) ([e-mail])
Denise M. Mingrone (SBN 135224) ([e-mail])
Andrew S. Ong (SBN 267889) ([e-mail])
Morvarid Metanat (SBN 268228) ([e-mail])

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Siliconware Precision Industries
Co., Ltd. and Siliconware U.S.A., Inc.
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl.
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) ([e-mail])
Sundeep K. (Rob) Addy (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Nosson D. Knobloch (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])

13
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc.
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION

18
19

TESSERA, INC.,

20
21
22
23
24

Case No. C 05-04063 CW (EDL)
Plaintiff,

v.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
FINAL DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al.
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:05-CV-04063-CW

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1196 Filed05/09/13 Page2 of 3

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and

2

Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc. and Defendants and Counterclaimants Siliconware Precision

3

Industries Co., Ltd. and Siliconware USA, Inc. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), that

4

all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses as between them in the above-captioned

5

matter be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own

6

costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

7
8

DATED: May 9, 2013

9

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
By: /s/ Michael F. Heafey
Michael F. Heafey

10

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Siliconware
Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and Siliconware U.S.A., Inc.

11
12
13

DATED: May 9, 2013

14

By: /s/ Sean C. Grimsley
Sean C. Grimsley

15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
Tessera, Inc.

17
18
19
20
21

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR &
SCOTT LLP

SO ORDERED.
5/9/2013
DATED: ________________

___________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:05-CV-04063-CW

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1196 Filed05/09/13 Page3 of 3

1
2

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

3

counsel for Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and Siliconware U.S.A., Andrew Ong and

4

Michael Heafey.

5
6
7
8
9

DATED: May 9, 2013

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
By: /s/ Sean C. Grimsley
Sean C. Grimsley
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
Tessera, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-