Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 1279

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 1271 Stipulation of Final Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendants and Counterclaimants ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. and ChipMOS U.S.A. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1271 Filed11/12/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail]
Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail]
Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) [e-mail]
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl.
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc.
Joseph R. Lanser (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail]
Matthew A. Werber (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail]
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. and ChipMOS U.S.A.

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18

Tessera, Inc.,
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
v.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.,
Defendants and Counterclaimants.

Case No. 4:05-cv-04063-CW
Stipulation and Order of Final
Dismissal with Prejudice

19
20
21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and

22

Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc. (“Tessera”) and Defendants and Counterclaimants

23

ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. and ChipMOS U.S.A. (collectively, “ChipMOS”) pursuant to

24

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), that all claims and counterclaims as between them in the

25

above-captioned matter be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with

26

each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.

27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1271 Filed11/12/13 Page2 of 3

1

DATED: November 12 2013
__,

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR &
SCOTT LLP

2

By: /s/ Eric R. Olson
Eric R. Olson
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc.
SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP

3
4

12
DATED: November __, 2013

By: /s/ Joseph R. Lanser

5

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ChipMOS
Technologies, Inc., and ChipMOS U.S.A.

6
7
8
9
10

SO ORDERED.
DATED:

11/15/2013
The Honorable Claudia Wilken

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

Case4:05-cv-04063-CW Document1271 Filed11/12/13 Page3 of 3

1
2
3

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained
from counsel for ChipMOS, Joseph R. Lanser.

4
5

12
Dated: November __, 2013

6

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR &
SCOTT LLP
By: /s/ Eric R. Olson
Eric R. Olson
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc.

7
8
9
10
11
12

4817-2038-3506, v 2

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE