Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 1419

AMENDED ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken REGARDING (367 in case 4:12-cv-00692-CW and 1415 in case 4:05-cv-04063-CW) MOTIONS TO ALTER CASE SCHEDULE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 TESSERA, INC., 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Defendant. ________________________________/ TESSERA, INC., 11 12 No. C 05-4063 CW No. C 12-692 CW Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO ALTER CASE SCHEDULE v. 13 MOTOROLA, INC., et al., 14 Defendant. ________________________________/ 15 16 17 (Re: Docket Nos. 1377, 1379, 1380) AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS / Plaintiff Tessera, Inc., Defendant Qualcomm, Inc., and 18 Defendants STMicroelectronics, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. 19 (ST) all move to alter the case schedule to accommodate the Court- 20 appointed expert’s (CAE) request to extend the deadline for his 21 expert report to March 14, 2014. 22 proposals, the Court finds that ST’s has the advantage. 23 proposed adjustment provides sufficient time for the Court to 24 consider the parties’ summary judgment motions and for the parties 25 to attend another mediation following the CAE’s opinion. 26 Accordingly, ST’s proposal is adopted: 27 28 Of the three competing ST’s 1 Event Date 2 CAE Report March 14, 2014 3 CAE Deposition Deadline April 1, 2014 4 Tessera’s Summary Judgment (SJ) April 7, 20141 5 and Claim Construction (CC) 6 Defendants’ SJ and CC; Response 7 to Tessera SJ 8 Tessera’s Response to SJ; Reply 9 SJ and CC April 21, 2014 May 5, 2014 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants’ Reply SJ and CC May 19, 2014 11 CAE Advisory Opinion on CC June 2, 2014 12 Deadline for Mandatory Mediation June 13, 2014 13 for All Parties 14 CMC and Hearing on CC and SJ June 19, 2014 15 Pretrial Conference October 8, 2014 16 Jury Trial November 10, 2014 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: 3/26/2014 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Because Tessera has already filed its summary judgment brief in advance of the new deadline, it may withdraw its motion, giving notice to Defendants and the Court without delay, and refile before the new deadline. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?