Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 1499

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 1497 Stipulation OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ST MICROELECTRONICS, INC. AND ST MICROELECTRONICS N.V. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

David L. Anderson (SBN 149604) ([e-mail])
Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459) ([e-mail])
Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) ([e-mail])
Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781) ([e-mail])
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Bryan K. Anderson (SBN 170666) ([e-mail])
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Bldg. 1
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-claimants
STMicroelectronics, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.
Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) ([e-mail])
Sundeep K. (Rob) Addy (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
Nosson D. Knobloch (Pro Hac Vice) ([e-mail])
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl.
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Tessera, Inc.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

OAKLAND DIVISION

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

TESSERA, INC.,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counter-defendant, )
)
v.
)
)
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. ET
)
AL.,
)
)
Defendants and Counter)
claimants.
)
)

Case No. 4:05-cv-04063-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF ST
MICROELECTRONICS, INC. AND ST
MICROELECTRONICS N.V.

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:05-CV-04063-CW

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and

2

Counterdefendant, Tessera, Inc. and Defendants and Counterclaimants STMicroelectronics, Inc. and

3

STMicroelectronics N.V. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), that all claims, counterclaims,

4

and affirmative defenses as between them in the above-captioned matter be, and upon approval by

5

the Court are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and

6

attorneys’ fees.

7
8

Dated: September 4, 2014
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

9
10
By: /s/ David L. Anderson_______
11
David L. Anderson
12
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counter-claimants STMicroelectronics, Inc.
and STMicroelectronics N.V.

13
14
15

Dated: September 4, 2014

16

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR &
SCOTT LLP

17
18
By: /s/ Eric R. Olson______
19
Eric R. Olson
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
Tessera, Inc.

21
22
23

SO ORDERED.

24
25

9/5/2014
DATED: ________________

26
27

___________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:05-CV-04063-CW

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

1
2
3

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from counsel for Tessera, Inc., Eric R. Olson.

4
5

Dated: September 4, 2014
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

6
7
By: /s/ Ryan M. Sandrock _______
8
Ryan M. Sandrock
9
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counter-claimants STMicroelectronics, Inc.
and STMicroelectronics N.V.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:05-CV-04063-CW