Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 946

ORDER Granting (43 in 4:08-cv-03726-CW), (32 in 4:10-cv-04954-CW),(55 in 4:08-cv-03667-CW), (51 in 4:08-cv-03827-CW), (943 in 4:05-cv-04063-CW) Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT NAMES OF PROPOSED CANDIDATES FOR COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/17/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

[COUNSEL OF RECORD LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15
16

Tessera, Inc.,

Case No. 4:05-cv-04063-CW

Plaintiff and Counter-defendant,
v.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.,

17

Defendants and Counter-claimants.

18

STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
MEET AND CONFER AND
SUBMIT NAMES OF PROPOSED
CANDIDATES FOR COURTAPPOINTED EXPERT

19
20
21

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

22

Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.,
and Siliconware U.S.A.,

23

Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants,

24

Case No. 4:08-cv-03667-CW

v.
Tessera, Inc.,

25

Defendant and Counter-claimant.

26
27
28
16171824.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

1
2

ChipMOS Technologies Inc., ChipMOS
Technologies (Bermuda) Ltd. and ChipMOS
U.S.A., Inc.,
Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants,

3
4

v.
Tessera, Inc.,

5
6
7
8
9

Defendant and Counter-claimant.
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.,
ASE Test Limited, and ASE (U.S.) Inc.,
Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants,
Tessera, Inc.,
Defendant and Counter-claimant.
Spansion, Inc., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

Case No. 4:08-cv-03726-CW

v.

10
11

Case No. 4:08-cv-03827-CW

v.

Case No. 4:10-cv-04954-CW

Tessera, Inc.,
Claimant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16171824.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

1

WHEREAS, the Court held a Case Management Conference on January 4, 2012 and

2

issued an Order requiring the parties in the above-referenced cases to meet and confer by

3

January 20, 2012 to select a court-appointed expert and, in the event the parties are unable to

4

agree on such expert, to submit the names of proposed candidates to the Court by February

5

3, 2012; and

6

WHEREAS, on December 28, 2011 the defendants in Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.,

7

et al., Case No. 2:07-cv-143 (E.D. Tex.) (“the Motorola Action”) filed a motion to transfer

8

that case to this Court; and

9

WHEREAS, following the Case Management Conference with this Court, Plaintiff

10

Tessera, Inc. determined not to oppose the motion for transfer of the Motorola Action; and

11

WHEREAS, the defendants in the Motorola Action wish to participate in the

12

selection of the court-appointed expert and have indicated to Tessera’s counsel that, in order

13

to allow their participation, they would support a request to extend by one week the time for

14

the parties in the above-referenced actions to meet and confer regarding the selection of the

15

court-appointed expert; and

16
17
18
19

WHEREAS, the parties to the present action think that such a one-week extension is
reasonable;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to
the following schedule, subject to the approval of the Court:
1.

20
21

The parties shall meet and confer regarding the selection of a court-

appointed expert by January 27, 2012, and
2.

22

In the event the parties are not able to reach agreement on a court-

23

appointed expert, the parties shall submit a letter to the Court with the names of proposed

24

candidates by February 10, 2012.

25
26
27
28

16171824. 1

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

1

DATED: January 13, 2012

2
3
4
5
6
7

By:__/s/ Ted G. Dane______________
Gregory P. Stone gregory.stone.mto.com
Ted G. Dane [e-mail]
Katherine K. Huang [e-mail]
Andrew Song [e-mail]
L. Ashley Aull [e-mail]
Eric P. Tuttle [e-mail]
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
355 S. Grand Ave., 35th Fl.
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. [e-mail]
Eric R. Olson [e-mail]
Sean Grimsley [e-mail]
Sundeep (Rob) K. Addy [e-mail]
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl.
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13

19

Morgan Chu [e-mail]
Aaron H. Cole [e-mail]
Jonathan Steinberg [e-mail]
Benjamin Hattenbach [e-mail]
Ellison Shelton Turner [e-mail]
Nathan N. Lowenstein [e-mail]
Irell & Manella LLP
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

20

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Tessera, Inc.

14
15
16
17
18

21

DATED: January 13, 2012

22
23
24
25

Steven J. Rizzi
[e-mail]
Foley & Lardner LLP

26
27
28

By:_______/s/ Steven J. Rizzi________________
Gina A. Bibby
[e-mail]
Foley & Lardner LLP
975 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

16171824. 1

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

90 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016-1314
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

1
2
3

Attorneys for Defendants Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. and
ASE (U.S.) Inc.

4
5

DATED: January 13, 2012

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Spansion Inc.,
Spansion Technology LLC, and Spansion LLC

13

Attorneys for Reorganized Debtors/Plaintiffs Spansion Inc., Spansion
Technology LLC, Cerium Laboratories LLC, and Spansion
International, Inc.

14
15
16

DATED: January 13, 2012

17
18
19
20
21

By:______/s/ Michael F. Heafey___________
Michael F. Heafey
[e-mail]
Andrew S. Ong
[e-mail]
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and
Siliconware USA Inc.

22
23

By:________/s/ Elaine Y. Chow_________________
Michael J. Bettinger
[e-mail]
Timothy P. Walker
[e-mail]
Elaine Y. Chow
[e-mail]
Stephen M. Everett
[e-mail]
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Ctr., Ste. 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

DATED: January 13, 2012

24
25
26

By:________/s/ Joseph R. Lanser____________
Lawrence E. Butler
[e-mail]
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
560 Mission St., Ste. 3100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

27
28

16171824. 1

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

Alan L. Unikel
[e-mail]
Joseph R. Lanser
[e-mail]
Matthew A. Werber
[e-mail]
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
131 S. Dearborn St., Ste. 2400
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

1
2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants Chipmos U.S.A., Inc., Chipmos Technologies,
Inc., and ChipMOS Technologies (Bermuda) Ltd.

7
8

DATED: January 13, 2012

9
10
11
12

Edward V. Anderson
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
1001 Page Mill Road
Bldg. 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants STMicroelectronics, Inc. and STMicroelectronics
N.V.

18
19

DATED: January 13, 2012

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

By:____/s/ Steven S. Cherensky_____________
Matthew D. Powers
[e-mail]
Steven S. Cherensky
[e-mail]
Azra M. Hadzimehmedovic
[e-mail]
Stefani Smith
[e-mail]
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Stats Chippac Ltd., Stats Chippac, Inc., Stats
Chippac (BVI) Limited

27
28

By:______/s/ Edward V. Anderson_____________
David L. Anderson
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California St., Ste. 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104-1715
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

16171824. 1

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

1/17/2012
Dated: ____________________

______________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

16171824. 1

5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases

Filer’s Attestation

1

I, Ted G. Dane, am the ECF user whose identification and password are

2
3

being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

4

EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT

5

NAMES OF PROPOSED CANDIDATES FOR COURT-APPOINTED

6

EXPERT. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that the above-

7

named signatories concur in this filing.

8

DATED: January 13, 2012

/s/ Ted G. Dane

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

16171824. 1

6

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C 05-4063 CW and related cases