Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filing 998

ORDER REGARDING COURT EXPERT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/16/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

TESSERA, INC.,
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

27
28

ORDER REGARDING
COURT EXPERT

v.
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., a
Delaware corporation; SPANSION,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability
corporation; SPANSION, INC., a
Delaware corporation; SPANSION
TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware
corporation; ADVANCED
SEMICONDUCTOR ENGINEERING, INC.,
a Republic of China corporation;
ASE (U.S.), INC., a California
corporation; CHIPMOS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Republic of
China corporation; CHIPMOS
U.S.A., INC., a California
corporation; SILICONWARE
PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., a
Republic of China corporation;
SILICONWARE USA, INC., a
California corporation;
STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., a
Netherlands corporation;
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., a
Delaware corporation; STATS
CHIPPAC, INC., a Delaware
corporation; STATS CHIPPAC (BVI),
INC., a British Virgin Islands
company; STATS CHIPPAC, LTD., a
Singapore company,
Defendants.
________________________________/
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES
CO, LTD; SILICONWARE U.S.A.,
INC.,
Plaintiffs,

25
26

No. C 05-4063 CW

v.
TESSERA, INC.,
Defendant.
________________________________/

No. C 08-3667 CW

1
2

CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
CHIPMOS U.S.A., INC.; CHIPMOS
TECHNOLOGIES (BERMUDA), LTD.,

3
4

Plaintiffs,
v.

5

TESSERA, INC.,

6

Defendant.
________________________________/

7
8
9

ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR
ENGINEERING, INC.; ASE TEST
LIMITED; ASE (U.S.), INC.,

11
12

No. C 08-3726 CW

Plaintiffs,

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. C 08-3827 CW

v.
TESSERA, INC.,

13

Defendant.
________________________________/

14

SPANSION, INC.,

15
16

et al.,

No. C 10-4954 CW

Plaintiffs,
v.

17

TESSERA, INC.,

18

Claimant.
________________________________/

19
20

POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC.,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24
25

No. C 10-945 CW

v.
TESSERA, INC.,
Defendant.
________________________________/

26
27
28
2

1

POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC.,

2
3
4

No. C 11-6121 CW

Plaintiff,
v.
TESSERA, INC.,

5

Defendant.

6

________________________________/

7

TESSERA, INC.,

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 12-692 CW

Plaintiff,
v.
QUALCOMM, INC.; FREESCALE
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; ATI
TECHNOLOGIES, ULC,
Defendants.

13

________________________________/

14

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/

15

The Court notes that one name was inadvertently omitted from
16
the list of parties and attorneys that was attached to the Court’s
17
April 9, 2012 Order Concerning Duties and Instructions for the
18
Court-Appointed Expert, that of party Powertech Technology, Inc.
19
Thus, the Court asks Dr. Dauskardt to confirm by signing and
20
returning the attached form that he has no conflict of interest,
21
with respect to Powertech Technology, Inc., that has not already
22
been disclosed to the parties.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: 5/16/2012
26

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

27
28
3

1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

2

I affirm that I have disclosed truthfully to the parties all

3

potential conflicts of interest that I may have to the best of my

4

knowledge, with respect to Powertech Technology, Inc.

5
6

Dated: _____________________

__________________________
DR. REINHOLD DAUSKARDT

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4