Genmark Automation, Inc. v. Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc.

Filing 117

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 116 Stipulation filed by Genmark Automation, Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/9/2010. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/16/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/6/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)

Genmark Automation, Inc. v. Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc.

Doc. 117

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Robert E. Camors, Jr., CA BAR NO. 121204
[e-mail]

975 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.856.3710

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI JAMES C. YOON, CA Bar No. 177155
[e-mail]

650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, v. CASE NO. 3:05-cv-04707 PJH STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS

INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC., Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 a California corporation, Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton Defendant, Counterclaimant.

Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc. ("Genmark") and Defendant, Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc., ("IRSI") (Genmark and IRSI are collectively "the Parties") hereby stipulate and agree to seek an order continuing the Case Management Conference which has been set by the Court to occur on July 15, 2010 by the Clerk's Notice dated March 31, 2010 (Docket Item No. 112). The facts supporting this Stipulation are in the Declaration of Robert E. Camors, Jr. filed herewith and which is Exhibit A hereto ("Camors Decl.").
STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff and Defendant request the continuation of this case management conference in order to have additional time to pursue settlement discussions and to prepare settlement documentation. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. The parties have been discussing settlement since October 2009 and have recently agreed to a non-binding term sheet that is intended to facilitate the settlement of the case. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. Plaintiff and Defendant are aware that the case management conference statement which would be expected by the Court, would have to be filed no later that July 8, 2010. The Parties believe that the use of the available time to draft settlement documents would best serve the interests of justice and therefore request at least a forty-five (45) day extension or continuation of the case management conference. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc., and Defendant, Innovative Robotics, Inc., stipulate and agree that the Case Management Conference should be continued to a date that is at least 45 days after July 15, 2010, which will allow the Parties 60 days to seek a final settlement of the case. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: July 2, 2010 Foley & Lardner LLP By: /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff Genmark Automation, Inc.

Dated: July 1, 2010

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati By: /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon Attorneys for Defendant Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc.

-2STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH

1 2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
S DISTRICT TE C TA

UNIT ED

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RT U O

S

Dated: July 6

, 2010

ER

N

THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 AT 2:00 P.M.

F D IS T IC T O R

-3STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH

A

C

LI

FO

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton amilton U.S. District HCourt Judge hyllis J. Judge P
R NIA
NO

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant conferred on the 1st day of July, 2010, and that this stipulation was signed by the attorneys whose names appear above. Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC.

-4STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 2nd day of July, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically through the Court's CM/ECF system, with notice of case activity automatically generated and sent electronically to all parties. /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH