Genmark Automation, Inc. v. Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc.

Filing 124

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 123 Stipulation filed by Genmark Automation, Inc., Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/14/2010. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/21/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/9/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)

Download PDF
Genmark Automation, Inc. v. Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc. Doc. 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 McPHARLIN SPRINKLES & THOMAS LLP Robert E. Camors, Jr., CA BAR NO. 121204 BOBCAMORS@MSTPARTNERS.COM 160 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408.293.1900 Facsimile: 408.293.1999 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI JAMES C. YOON, CA Bar No. 177155 JYOON@WSGR.COM 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, v. CASE NO. 05-cv-04707 PJH STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 30 DAYS INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC., Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 a California corporation, Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton Defendant, Counterclaimant. Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc. ("Genmark") and Defendant, Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc., ("IRSI") (Genmark and IRSI are collectively "the Parties") hereby stipulate and agree to seek an order continuing the Case Management Conference which has been set by the Court to occur on September 16, 2010 by the Court's Order dated July 6, 2010 (Docket Item No. 117). The facts supporting this Stipulation are in the Declaration of Robert E. Camors, Jr. filed herewith and which is Exhibit A hereto ("Camors Decl."). STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 30 DAYS CASE NO. 05-CV-04707 PJH Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff and Defendant request the continuation of this case management conference in order to have additional time to pursue settlement discussions and to prepare settlement documentation. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. Settlement work has progressed since the filing of the last stipulated request for an order continuing the case management conference on July 2, 2010. Genmark's attorneys provided a comprehensive set of settlement documents to counsel for the defendant on August 12, 2010 and as of September 7, 2010 defendant was still considering those documents. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. The Parties request further thirty day extension or continuation of the case management conference to facilitate their efforts to resolve this case without additional litigation. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc., and Defendant, Innovative Robotics, Inc., stipulate and agree that the Case Management Conference should be continued to a date that is at least 30 days after September 16, 2010, which will allow the Parties an additional 38 days to seek a final settlement of the case. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: September 8, 2010 McPharlin Sprinkles & Thomas LLP By: /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff Genmark Automation, Inc. Dated: September 8, 2010 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati By: /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon Attorneys for Defendant Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc. -2STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 05-CV-04707 PJH 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED S DISTRICT TE C TA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 21, 2010 AT 2:00 P.M. ER N F D IS T IC T O R -3STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 05-CV-04707 PJH A C LI FO 5 Judge P hyllis J. R NIA 4 Dated: September 9 , 2010 UNIT ED 3 RT U O S IT IS S Hon. PhyllisOJ. Hamilton U.S. District Court iJudge n Ham lto NO ORDER ED RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant conferred on the 8th day of September, 2010, and that this stipulation was signed by the attorneys whose names appear above. Dated: September 8, 2010 /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC. -4STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS CASE NO. 05-CV-04707 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 8th day of September, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically through the Court's CM/ECF system, with notice of case activity automatically generated and sent electronically to all parties. /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 05-CV-04707 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?