Holloway et al v. Best Buy Co., Inc.

Filing 331

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PORTIONS OF DOCKET ITEM NO. 324 re 330 Stipulation filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/1/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)

Download PDF
Holloway et al v. Best Buy Co., Inc. Doc. 331 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Roman M. Silberfeld, RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com (#62783) Lisa L. Heller, LLHeller@rkmc.com (#126086) David Martinez, DMartinez@rkmc.com (#193183) ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 George A. Stohner, GStohner@morganlewis.com (#214508) Paul C. Evans, PEvans@morganlewis.com (Pro Hac Vice) Blair J. Robinson, Blair.Robinson@morganlewis.com (Pro Hac Vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Telephone: (213) 612-2500 Facsimile: (213) 612-2501 Attorneys for Defendants, BEST BUY CO., INC. and BEST BUY STORES, L.P. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION JASMEN HOLLOWAY, AMY GARCIA, CHERYL CHAPPEL, ERIC BLACKSHER, JESSICA TREAS, LAWRENCE SANTIAGO, JR., MUEMBO MUANZA, MAURICE CALHOUN, and NICHOLAS DIXON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BEST BUY CO., INC., and BEST BUY STORES, L.P., Defendants. /// /// /// 60400738.1 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES Case No. C 05-05056 PJH (MEJ) [Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PORTIONS OF DOCKET ITEM NO. 324 Action Filed: December 8, 2005 [Proposed Order filed concurrently herewith] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, on October 27, 2010, counsel for Defendants Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores, L.P. ("Best Buy") e-filed Docket Item No. 324; WHEREAS Docket Item No. 324 contains seven exhibits that are attachments to the Declaration of David Martinez in Support of Best Buy's Opposition to Motion for Class Certification ("Martinez Declaration"); WHEREAS portions of Docket Item No. 324 were filed in error. In particular, the originally-filed versions of exhibits Doc(108) and Doc(108a) ­ comprising attachments 3 to 7 of Docket Item No. 324 ­ contained errors and unredacted personal information; WHEREAS the ECF Help Desk placed a temporary lock on exhibits Doc(108) and Doc(108a) shortly after they were filed; and WHEREAS Best Buy's counsel has since filed corrected redacted versions of Doc(108) and Doc(108a), which can be found in the record at Docket Item No. 328, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 1. Attachments 3 to 7 of Docket Item No. 324 be removed from the record. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: /S/ Vincent S. Loh Vincent S. Loh ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DATED: October 28, 2010 Attorneys for Defendants, BEST BUY CO, INC. and BEST BUY STORES, L.P. DATED: October 28, 2010 ALTSHULER, BERZON LLP By: /S/ Eve H. Cervantez Eve H. Cervantez ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 60400738.1 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby Orders the following regarding Docket Item No. 324: 1. Attachments 3 to 7 of Docket Item No. 324 be removed from the record. S DISTRICT TE C TA ___________________________________ 7 UNIT ED ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 60400738.1 ER N F D IS T IC T O R ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER A C LI FO Judge P hyllis J. Hamilto n R NIA PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON ERED United States SO ORD Court Judge IT IS District NO S 6 11/1/10 DATED: __________________________ RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?