Campbell v. National Passenger Railroad Corporation et al

Filing 242

ORDER re 241 REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR POST-TRIAL MOTIONS. Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2009 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/3/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c. b. a. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief and pre-judgment interest shall be filed by April 9, 2009, in a brief not exceeding 15 pages. Defendants' opposition papers and cross-motions shall be filed by April 23, 2009, in a single brief not exceeding 25 pages. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motions and reply brief for Plaintiff's motions, if any, shall be filed by May 7, 2009, in a single brief not exceeding 25 pages. The parties, having met and conferred by and through their respective counsel, following a conference with the Court on March 24, 2009, in consideration of the Court and counsel's schedules, have stipulated that the briefing schedule for the parties' post-trial motions may be modified: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, ) JOE DEELY and DOES 1 through 15 ) ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) JOHN EARL CAMPBELL, NO. C05-5434 CW ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR POST-TRIAL MOTIONS DATE: March 26, 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 d. Defendants' reply brief for Defendant's motions, if any, shall be filed by May 14, 2009, not exceeding 15 pages. e. All motions shall be heard on June 11, 2009. Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees shall be filed by June 18, 2009. 4/3/09 Dated: __________________ __________________________________________ HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?