Securities and Exchange Commission v. McAfee Inc.

Filing 113

AMENDED ORDER re 111 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds Distribution Agent's Application for Payment of Fees and Expenses filed by Jeffrey Plotkin. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/6/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. McAfee Inc. Doc. 113 EXHIBIT 2 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, C-06-0009 (PHI) V. McAFEE, INC. (f/k/a Network Associates, Inc.), Defendant. AMENDED fPROPOSED1 ORDER INSTRUCTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO DISBURSE FUNDS TO PAY FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE DISTRIBUTION AGENT The Court, having reviewed the Distribution Agent's Application for Payment of Fees and Expenses, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check on the Court Registry Investment System ("CRIS"), Account Number C06-0009PJH, under the case name designation "SEC v. McAfee, Inc." in the amount of $9,431.53 payable to "Day Pitney LLP" for the payment of fees and expenses incurred by the Distribution Agent during the three-month period from December 2011 1, 2010 through February 28, 2010, as described in the Distribution Agent's Application for Payment of Fees and Expenses, dated March 31, 2011. The check shall also contain the following notation: "payment for matter no. 406440.121450". 83486696.1 2. The Clerk shall send the check by overnight mail to: Jeffrey Plotkin, Esq. One Canterbury Green Stamford, CT 06901 Tel: (203) 977-7300 3. The Distribution Agent shall provide the Court Registry with the necessary overnight shipping information and the Distribution Agent's billing number. Dated: 4/6/11 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R B3486696.1 -2- A C LI FO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ilton s J. Ham e Phylli Judg R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?