FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Re: Shane Glynn Pursuant to Local Rule 11-9 (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2006)
FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network
Doc. 16
Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW
Document 16
Filed 03/29/2006
Page 1 of 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PAUL J. ANDRE, BAR NO. 196585 (pandre@perksincoie.com) LISA KOBIALKA, Bar No. 191404 (lkobialka@perkinscoie.com) ESHA BANDYOPADHYAY, Bar No. 212249 (ebandyopadhyay@perkinscoie.com) SEAN M. BOYLE, Bar No. 238123 (sboyle@perkinscoie.com) PERKINS COIE LLP 101 Jefferson Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 838-4300 Facsimile: (650) 838-4350 Attorneys for Defendant The Freecycle Network, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California unincorporated association, Plaintiff, v. THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant. CASE NO. C 06-00324 CW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC.'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE BY SHANE GLYNN PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 11-9 Date: Time: Place: Judge: March 31, 2006 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 2 (Oakland) Honorable Claudia Wilken
This Court, having considered Defendant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s Miscellaneous Administrative Request for Appearance by Shane Glynn pursuant to Local Rule 11-9, hereby GRANTS Defendant's request for permission for Shane Glynn to appear in this action in accordance with and under the provisions of Rule 11-9. IT IS SO ORDERED, THIS 29th DAY OF MARCH, 2006, /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN _______________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge
_________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED]ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST CASE NO. C 06-00324 CW
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?