FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network

Filing 26

Proposed Order re 24 MOTION to Strike 23 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by FreecycleSunnyvale, FreecycleSunnyvale. (Feinberg, Ian) (Filed on 5/4/2006)

Download PDF
FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network Doc. 26 Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 26 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Ian N. Feinberg (SBN 88324) ifeinberg@mayerbrownrose.com Dennis S. Corgill (SBN 103429) dcorgill@mayerbrownrose.com Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476) eevans@mayerbrownrose.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 Attorneys for Plaintiff FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OAKLAND DIVISION FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California unincorporated association, Plaintiff, v. THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, an Arizona corporation, Defendant. Case No. C06-00324 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIMANT THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) AND STRIKING THE STATE-LAW COUNTERCLAIM UNDER CAL. CODE. CIV. PROC. 425.16 Date: Time: Before: Location: June 9, 2006 1:30 p.m. Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom 2 THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Counterclaimant, v. FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California unincorporated association, Counterdefendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING/STRIKING COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW PADB01 44020103.1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 26 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 9, 2006, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant FreecyleSunnyvale's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims under Fed.R.civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Strike State-Law Counterclaim under Cal.Code.Civ.Proc 425.16 came on for hearing before this Court. Having considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to Plaintiff and Counterdefendant's Motions, and good cause appearing, the COURT GRANTS the Motions. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s counterclaim for infringement under 32(1) of the Lanham Act is dismissed with prejudice; (2) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s counterclaim for contributory trademark infringement under 43(a) of the Lanham Act is dismissed; (3) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s counterclaim for unfair competition under 43(a) of the Lanham Act is dismissed; (4) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s counterclaim for unfair competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 and 17500 is dismissed; and (5) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s state-law counterclaim for unfair competition is striken or, in the alternative, Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc., must demonstrate a probability of prevailing under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 425.16. Dated: ___________________ ____________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge Northern District of California [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING/STRIKING COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW PADB01 44020103.1 Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 26 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW PADB01 44020103.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?