FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network

Filing 26

Proposed Order re 24 MOTION to Strike 23 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by FreecycleSunnyvale, FreecycleSunnyvale. (Feinberg, Ian) (Filed on 5/4/2006)

FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network

Doc. 26

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW

Document 26

Filed 05/04/2006

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP Ian N. Feinberg (SBN 88324) [e-mail] Dennis S. Corgill (SBN 103429) [e-mail] Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476) [e-mail] Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OAKLAND DIVISION FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California unincorporated association, Plaintiff, v. THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, an Arizona corporation, Defendant. Case No. C06-00324 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIMANT THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) AND STRIKING THE STATE-LAW COUNTERCLAIM UNDER CAL. CODE. CIV. PROC. § 425.16 Date: Time: Before: Location: June 9, 2006 1:30 p.m. Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom 2

THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Counterclaimant, v. FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California unincorporated association, Counterdefendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING/STRIKING COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW
PADB01 44020103.1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW

Document 26

Filed 05/04/2006

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On June 9, 2006, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant FreecyleSunnyvale's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims under Fed.R.civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Strike State-Law Counterclaim under Cal.Code.Civ.Proc § 425.16 came on for hearing before this Court. Having considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to Plaintiff and Counterdefendant's Motions, and good cause appearing, the COURT GRANTS the Motions. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s

counterclaim for infringement under § 32(1) of the Lanham Act is dismissed with prejudice; (2) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s

counterclaim for contributory trademark infringement under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act is dismissed; (3) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s

counterclaim for unfair competition under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act is dismissed; (4) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s

counterclaim for unfair competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 and 17500 is dismissed; and (5) Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc.'s

state-law counterclaim for unfair competition is striken or, in the alternative, Defendant and Counterclaimant The Freecycle Network, Inc., must demonstrate a probability of prevailing under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16.

Dated: ___________________ ____________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge Northern District of California
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING/STRIKING COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW
PADB01 44020103.1

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW

Document 26

Filed 05/04/2006

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. C06-00324 CW
PADB01 44020103.1