Fosselman v. Gibbs et al

Filing 75

ORDER TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/19/09. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. RANDOLPH GIBBS, M.D.; ALLISON BRAGER; C. KATES, LVN; CHARLES DUDLEY LEE, M.D., Health Care Manager; and C. MATHEWS, MTA, Defendants. / LORENZO FOSSELMAN JR., Plaintiff, No. C 06-0375 PJH (PR) . ORDER TO RESPOND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a state prisoner. A motion for summary judgment by defendants Lee, Kates, and Brager was denied; the case was stayed and referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for settlement. Judge Vadas reported that the case did not settle. As a result the stay was lifted and deadlines were set. Plaintiff contends that his legal papers were taken from him at the time of the settlement conference and have not been returned five months later. He also contends that attempts to obtain them using the grievance system have been futile. He has moved for a copy of the entire court file so he can litigate the case. It would assist the court to have a response from the Attorney General. He therefore shall file a response to plaintiff's Motion for Administrative Relief within fourteen days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2009. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.06\FOSSELMAN375.ORDER RESPONSE.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?