Vedachalam v. Tata America International Corporation et al

Filing 333

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting #332 Stipulation to Shorten Time for Hearing re #327 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Settlement Approval. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) kdermody@lchb.com Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) dhutchinson@lchb.com Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) ashaver@lchb.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 7 8 9 10 11 Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862) stindall@rhdtlaw.com Rosha K. Jones (State Bar No. 279143) rjones@rhdtlaw.com RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-1800 Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 12 13 Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California Classes 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA BERI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW) 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 22 23 TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation; TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD, an Indian Corporation; and TATA SONS, LTD, an Indian Corporation, 24 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT APPROVAL Defendants. 25 26 27 28 -11083116.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW 1 STIPULATION 2 Plaintiffs Gopi Vedachalam and Kangana Beri (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and 3 the Plaintiff National and California Classes, and Defendants Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., 4 and Tata Sons, Ltd. (together, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 5 6 WHEREAS, on February 21, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (the “Unopposed Motion”); 7 8 WHEREAS, on February 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Notice of Motion setting the hearing date for this this Unopposed Motion for April 4, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.; 9 WHEREAS, the parties agree to shorten the time for hearing this Unopposed Motion; 10 WHEREAS, the Court’s calendar shows that the Court is unavailable for a hearing on 11 Thursday, February 28, 2013; 12 WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel is unavailable during the Court’s regular hearing 13 calendar on March 7, March 14, and March 21, 2013, as a result of various pre-scheduled 14 professional commitments, including a trip out of the country for a twelve-day period and a 15 scheduled Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Oral Argument on March 21, 2013 in Richmond 16 Virginia; 17 WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that this Court set a hearing on this 18 Unopposed Motion for Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon as the Court may hear 19 the matter; 20 WHEREAS, the parties are also willing to submit this matter for consideration on the 21 papers and waive hearing and respectfully request, in the alternative, that the Court decide 22 Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion on the papers if the Court, after consideration of the proposed 23 Settlement, adopts the Settlement as presented without any changes; 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED that this Court set 25 a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement for 26 Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or, in the alternative, preliminarily approve the 27 Settlement on the papers. 28 -21083116.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW 1 2 Dated: February 22, 2012 Respectfully submitted, LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 3 4 By: 5 /s/ Kelly M. Dermody Kelly M. Dermody 10 Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) kdermody@lchb.com Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) dhutchinson@lchb.com Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) ashaver@lchb.com 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 11 RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP 12 By: 6 7 8 9 13 Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862) stindall@rhdtlaw.com Rosha K. Jones (State Bar No. 279143) rjones@rhdtlaw.com 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-1800 Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 14 15 16 17 18 Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California Classes 19 20 /s/ Steven M. Tindall Steven M. Tindall Dated: February 22, 2013 LOEB & LOEB, LLP By: 21 22 /s/ Michelle La Mar Michelle La Mar Michelle La Mar (State Bar No. 163038) mlamar@loeb.com John Daryanani (State Bar No. 205149) jdaryanani@loeb.com 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4120 Telephone: (310) 282-2000 Facsimile: (310) 282-2200 23 24 25 26 27 28 -31083116.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW 1 Dated: February 22, 2013 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP 2 By: 3 4 /s/ Robert I. Steiner Robert I. Steiner William A. Escobar (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) wescobar@kelleydrye.com Robert I. Steiner (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) rsteiner@kelleydrye.com Kevin J. Smith (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ksmith@kelleydrye.com 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178 Telephone: (212) 808-7800 Facsimile: (212) 808-7897 Attorneys for Defendants TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD., and TATA SONS, LTD. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -41083116.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW 1 ORDER 2 In light of the parties’ stipulation regarding their desire to shorten time to set a hearing on 3 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, the Court will set a 4 hearing on the motion for Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: February 25 , 2013 By: HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN 8 Chief Judge, United States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -51083116.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?