Vedachalam v. Tata America International Corporation et al
Filing
333
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting #332 Stipulation to Shorten Time for Hearing re #327 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Settlement Approval. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
kdermody@lchb.com
Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458)
dhutchinson@lchb.com
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
ashaver@lchb.com
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
7
8
9
10
11
Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862)
stindall@rhdtlaw.com
Rosha K. Jones (State Bar No. 279143)
rjones@rhdtlaw.com
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP
100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-1800
Facsimile: (415) 421-1700
12
13
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and
California Classes
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA
BERI, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW)
18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
21
22
23
TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a New York
Corporation; TATA CONSULTANCY
SERVICES, LTD, an Indian Corporation;
and TATA SONS, LTD, an Indian
Corporation,
24
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR
HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
-11083116.1
JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW
1
STIPULATION
2
Plaintiffs Gopi Vedachalam and Kangana Beri (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and
3
the Plaintiff National and California Classes, and Defendants Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.,
4
and Tata Sons, Ltd. (together, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed Motion for Preliminary
Approval of Class Action Settlement (the “Unopposed Motion”);
7
8
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Notice of Motion setting
the hearing date for this this Unopposed Motion for April 4, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.;
9
WHEREAS, the parties agree to shorten the time for hearing this Unopposed Motion;
10
WHEREAS, the Court’s calendar shows that the Court is unavailable for a hearing on
11
Thursday, February 28, 2013;
12
WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel is unavailable during the Court’s regular hearing
13
calendar on March 7, March 14, and March 21, 2013, as a result of various pre-scheduled
14
professional commitments, including a trip out of the country for a twelve-day period and a
15
scheduled Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Oral Argument on March 21, 2013 in Richmond
16
Virginia;
17
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that this Court set a hearing on this
18
Unopposed Motion for Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon as the Court may hear
19
the matter;
20
WHEREAS, the parties are also willing to submit this matter for consideration on the
21
papers and waive hearing and respectfully request, in the alternative, that the Court decide
22
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion on the papers if the Court, after consideration of the proposed
23
Settlement, adopts the Settlement as presented without any changes;
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED that this Court set
25
a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement for
26
Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., or, in the alternative, preliminarily approve the
27
Settlement on the papers.
28
-21083116.1
JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW
1
2
Dated: February 22, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
3
4
By:
5
/s/ Kelly M. Dermody
Kelly M. Dermody
10
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
kdermody@lchb.com
Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458)
dhutchinson@lchb.com
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
ashaver@lchb.com
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
11
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP
12
By:
6
7
8
9
13
Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862)
stindall@rhdtlaw.com
Rosha K. Jones (State Bar No. 279143)
rjones@rhdtlaw.com
100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-1800
Facsimile: (415) 421-1700
14
15
16
17
18
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California
Classes
19
20
/s/ Steven M. Tindall
Steven M. Tindall
Dated: February 22, 2013
LOEB & LOEB, LLP
By:
21
22
/s/ Michelle La Mar
Michelle La Mar
Michelle La Mar (State Bar No. 163038)
mlamar@loeb.com
John Daryanani (State Bar No. 205149)
jdaryanani@loeb.com
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4120
Telephone: (310) 282-2000
Facsimile: (310) 282-2200
23
24
25
26
27
28
-31083116.1
JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW
1
Dated: February 22, 2013
KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Robert I. Steiner
Robert I. Steiner
William A. Escobar (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
wescobar@kelleydrye.com
Robert I. Steiner (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
rsteiner@kelleydrye.com
Kevin J. Smith (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
ksmith@kelleydrye.com
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178
Telephone: (212) 808-7800
Facsimile: (212) 808-7897
Attorneys for Defendants TATA CONSULTANCY
SERVICES, LTD., and TATA SONS, LTD.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-41083116.1
JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW
1
ORDER
2
In light of the parties’ stipulation regarding their desire to shorten time to set a hearing on
3
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, the Court will set a
4
hearing on the motion for Thursday, March 28, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
February 25
, 2013
By:
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
8
Chief Judge, United States District Court
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-51083116.1
JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. C-06-00963-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?