Sun Microsystems Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 405

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR JOINT OPPOSITION TO NANYA DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS re (243 in 3:07-cv-01212-PJH) Stipulation filed by JACO Electronics, Inc, (333 in 3:07-cv-01381-PJH) Stipulation filed by Dram Claims L iquidation Trust, (237 in 3:07-cv-01200-PJH) Stipulation filed by All American Semiconductor, Inc., (403 in 3:06-cv-01665-PJH) Stipulation filed by Sun Microsystems Inc.,, (226 in 3:07-cv-01207-PJH) Stipulation filed by Edge Electronics, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/19/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Kent A. Gardiner (pro hac vice) Kathryn D. Kirmayer (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) David D. Cross (pro hac vice) Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-2595 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 E-mail: kgardiner@crowell.co m kkirmayer@crowell.co m jmurphy@crowell.co m dcross@crowell.co m mmcburney@crowell.co m Daniel A. Sasse (CA Bar No. 236234) Theresa C. Lopez (CA Bar No. 205338) CROWELL & MORING LLP 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor Irvine, CA 92614-8505 Telephone: 949-263-8400 Facsimile: 949-263-8414 E-mail: dsasse@crowell.co m tlopez@crowell.com Counsel for Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys Corporation, Jaco Electronics, Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., and All American Semiconductor, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Sun Microsystems, Inc., et al. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al. Unisys Corporation v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al. All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al. Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al. DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al. Case Nos.: C-06-01665 PJH (Consolidated) C-06-02915 PJH C-07-01200 PJH C-07-01207 PJH C-07-01212 PJH C-07-01381 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR JOINT OPPOSITION TO NANYA DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION This Stipulation is entered into between plaintiffs Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys Corporation, All American Semiconductor, Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., Jaco Electronics, Inc., and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust (collect ively, "Plaintiffs") and defendants Nanya Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA (collectively, "Defendants") in the above-captioned actions, and is made with regard to the following facts: WHEREAS, the deadline to file opposit ions to disposit ive motions is September 24, 2008; WHEREAS, the parties are cooperating with each other in order to coordinate the briefing of disposit ive motions so that they will be able, to the extent possible, reduce the burden that such motions will impose upon the Court; WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-4 (b) permits parties to submit briefs up to 25 pages "[u]nless the Court expressly orders otherwise pursuant to a party's request made prior to the due date"; WHEREAS, on July 30, 2008, each of the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (totaling two motions) relating to all six cases; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that collectively they will need no more than 35 pages to present their arguments in opposition to the two motions filed by Defendants' for summary judgment; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that by filing a Joint Opposit ion Brief on behalf of all six plaintiffs in response to both summary judgment motions filed by Defendants they will be able to reduce significantly the total number of pages that would be submitted if each Plaintiff were to file a separate brief in opposition to each of Defendants' motions in each case; WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to Plaintiffs' request for 10 addit ional pages for the above-described Joint Opposit ion Brief; /// /// /// -1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows: 1. Plaint iffs shall file a Joint Opposition Brief in response to Defendants' two Motions for Summary Judgment relating to all six cases that is of no more than 35 pages in length. IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: September 16, 2008 CROWELL & MORING LLP By: /s/ David D. Cross David D. Cross Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.; UNISYS CORPORATION; ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. Dated: September 16, 2008 LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. By: /s/ James M. Lockhart James M. Lockhart Attorneys for Plaintiff DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Dated: September 16, 2008 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ Howard M. Ullman Howard M. Ullman Attorneys for Defendants NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA -2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION OF FILING I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the Plaintiffs and the Defendants listed in the signature blocks above. /s/ David D. Cross David D. Cross Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.; UNISYS CORPORATION; ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. -3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the foregoing stipulated request, other matters properly before the Court, and the record in this case, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaint iffs shall have an additional 10 pages (i.e., a total of 35 pages) for their joint brief in opposition to the two summary judgment briefs filed by defendants Nanya Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA relat ing to all six cases. UNIT ED 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September _19 , 2008 __ S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R -4STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381 A C LI FO By: ___________________________ Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton ton United States DiHaictilCourt Judge s J. str m e Phylli Judg R NIA I ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?