Sun Microsystems Inc., v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al

Filing 547

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) re 538 Stipulation, filed by Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. and Elpida Memory Inc., terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/24/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)

1 JAMES G. KREISSMAN (Bar No. 206740) [e-mail] m 2 HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (Bar No. 206822) [e-mail] m 3 JASON M. BUSSEY (Bar No. 227185) [e-mail] 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 Counsel for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 8 ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS CASE NO. C 06-01665

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaint iff, v. Case No. C 06-01665 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.

Defendants.

1

The parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants

2 Elpida Memory, Inc., and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This dismissal shall not 4 apply to or affect any other defendant. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

6 Dated: March 20, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 20, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. CROWELL & MORING LLP

By:

/s/ Jerome A. Murphy

Attorneys for Plaintiff SUN MICROSYSTEMS

ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained

20 concurrence in the filing of the stipulation from the parties listed above. 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

ER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS C N F CASE NO. C 06-01665 D IS T IC T O R 2

A

LI

25 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 ERED 26 Dated: March _____, 2009 O ORD IT IS S ___________________________ 27 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton lis J. Hamilton hyl Jud e P United States DistrictgJudge 28
S
NO

FO

R NIA

RT U O

RT

H