Atmel Corporation v. Authentec Inc

Filing 623

ORDER re #622 granting STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/10/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; ATMEL SWITZERLAND, a corporation; ATMEL FRANCE, a corporation; and ATMEL SARL, a corporation, Plaintiffs, v. AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 06-02138 CW (EDL) and (related action) STATUS REPORT, STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On July 14, 2008, the parties to the above-captioned matters informed this Court that they had reached a settlement in principle. On July 29, 2008, this Court entered an Order setting a thirtyfive (35) day deadline to finalize the settlement. The parties have been working toward finalizing the settlement. The parties' current understanding is that only minor details remain to be resolved, and it is anticipated that a settlement agreement will be executed shortly. The settlement agreement provides that a final stipulated dismissal would be filed with the Court three (3) business days after a certain event occurring up to ten (10) business days after execution of the agreement. In view of the foregoing, the parties agree that the thirty-five day (35) period set in the July 29, 2008 Order should be extended to accommodate final resolution of the remaining issues and extended to include the thirteen-business-day contingency period set forth in the settlement agreement. Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed between the parties: 1. That the thirty-five day time period set forth in paragraph 2 of the Court's July 29, 2008 Order shall be extended by fifteen (15) business days from the date of this Stipulation. STIPULATED AND AGREED.

DATED: September 2, 2008

By:

s/ Edward G. Poplawski Edward G. Poplawski Denise L. McKenzie Olivia M. Kim SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013-1010 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Atmel Corporation; Atmel Switzerland; Atmel France; and Atmel SARL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: September 2, 2008

By:

s/ Denise M. De Mory Henry C. Bunsow Denise De Mory Brian A.E. Smith HOWREY LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant AuthenTec, Inc.

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/10/08 DATED: ______________________________ ______________________________ United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3