UNISYS Corporation et al v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc,. et al

Filing 397

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG AND INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. re 395 Stipulation filed by Unisys Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/8/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2009)

--

1

2
3

James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice) Michael Olafson (pro hac vice) James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice) DeAnne M. Hilgers (pro hac vice)
John C. Ekman (pro hac vice)

4
5

6
7
8

Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. 4200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

9 10
11

Email: [e-mail]

Email: j [e-mail]

12
13

James J. Ficenec (SBN - 152172) Sellar Hazard Manning Ficenec & Lai 1800 Sutter Street, Ste. 460 Concord, CA 94520
Telephone: [phone]

14
15

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

16
17
18

Counsel for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 20 21

Unisys Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.: C06-02915-PJH

22

Hynix Semiconductor, et aI.,
Defendants.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND (PROPOSED) ORDER AS TO IN FINE ON TECHNOLOGIES AG AND INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

23

24
25 26 27 28
Stipulation of Dismissal as to lnfineon Defendants C06-029IS-PlH
Doc# 3126582\1

1

STIPULATION
The Parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America Corp., with prejudice, pursuant to Rule
41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of

2
3

4

Civil Procedure. This stipulation is pursuant to a settement

5

6 agreement negotiated by the Parties, and the Parties agree that the Court should reserve jurisdiction to

7 enforce the terms of that settlement agreement. Each Pary shall bear its own costs and attorney's
8 fees. This dismissal shall not apply to or affect any other defendant in this action. The dismissal is
9 without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to enforce the terms of

the Settlement Agreement.

10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

12
Dated: December 2, 2009

13

LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.

14
15

By: lsi James P. McCarthy James P. McCarthy

16 17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNISYS CORPORATION

19

Dated: December 2, 2009

KAYE SCHOLER LLP

20
21

By: lsi Julian Brew
Julian Brew

22
23

Attorneys for Defendants
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG AND INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

24
25

26
27
28
2
Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants
C06-029L S-PlH
Doc# 3126582\1

r
i

ATTESTATION OF FILING
2
3

Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the

fiing of this document from the parties listed above.

4
5

6
7
8

lsi James P. McCarthy

James P. McCarthy

9 10
11

12
13

14
15

16 17 18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26
27 28
3 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants C06-029IS-PlH
Doc# 3126582\1

(PROPOSED) ORDER
2
3

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated:
5

UNIT ED

S

12/8/09

S DISTRICT TE C TA

6
7 8

10
11

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

12
13

14
15

16
17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27 28
4
Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants C06-029l5-PJH
Doc# 3126582\1

A

C

LI

9

FO

hyllis Judge P

J. Hami

lton

R NIA

Hon. S SO ORDE Phyllis J. Hamilton In e UTitI d States District Judge

RED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

I