The State of California by its Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera and the Los Angeles Unified School District on Behalf of all other Politi et al v. Infineon Technologies AG et al

Filing 455

ORDER Granting re 453 (in 3:06-cv-04333-PJH) Stipulation Extending due Dates For Plaintiff States' Responses To Defendants' Interrogatories To Non Deposed Central Purchasing Agencies & Certain State Agencies, Universities/Colleges & Local Governments, filed by The State of California by its Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and the City and County of San Francisco ex rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/11/08. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California J. MATTHEW RODRIQUEZ Chief Assistant Attorney General KATHLEEN E. FOOTE (S.B. 65819) Senior Assistant Attorney General EMILIO E. VARANINI (S.B. 163952) Emilio.varanini@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 703-5908 Facsimile: (415) 703-5480 Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP KENNETH R. O'ROURKE (S.B. # 120144) korourke@omn.com STEVEN H. BERGMAN (S.B. # 180542) sbergman@omm.com JANE Y. CHANG (S.B. # 241890) jchang@omm.com 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for Defendants HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. 23 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, et al., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. C 06-4333 PJH Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR PLAINTIFF STATES' RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES TO NON DEPOSED CENTRAL PURCHASING AGENCIES AND CERTAIN STATE AGENCIES, UNIVERSITIES/COLLEGES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES--CASE NO. 02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES--CASE NO. 02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) WHEREAS, at the discovery conference held on July 25, 2008, the Court ordered that the Plaintiff States would submit their Responses to Defendants' Interrogatories to Certain State Agencies, Universities/Colleges, and Local Governments in Arizona, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, the Northern Mariana Islands, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin and Defendants' Interrogatories to Central Purchasing Agencies Not Being Deposed ("Defendants' Interrogatories") within 60 days from the hearing date, making the Responses due on September 23, 2008; WHEREAS the Plaintiff States requested an additional two weeks to submit their Responses to Defendants' Interrogatories; WHEREAS the Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff States' request for a two-week extension to submit their Responses to Defendants' Interrogatories. Plaintiff States and Defendants have stipulated and agreed as follows: Plaintiff States have an additional two weeks to submit their Responses to Defendants' Interrogatories. Plaintiff States' Responses to Defendants' Interrogatories will be due on October 7, 2008. DATED: September 11, 2008 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. Attorney General of the State of California J. MATTHEW RODRIQUEZ KATHLEEN E. FOOTE EMILIO E. VARANINI By: /s/Emilio E. Varanini Emilio E. Varanini . Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP KENNETH R. O'ROURKE STEVEN H. BERGMAN JANE Y. CHANG ____s/ Steven H. Bergman______________ Steven H. Bergman Attorneys for Defendants HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., and for the purposes of this stipulation only, signing on behalf of Defendants MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., MOSEL VITELIC INC., MOSEL VITELIC CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA and NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this stipulation from the Plaintiff States and Defendants listed above. _/s/ Emilio Varanini__________________ Emilio Varanini Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES--CASE NO. 02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) 1 2 3 4 ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S 11 Dated: September ____, 2008. S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES--CASE NO. 02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) A C LI FO I ______________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States MagistrateoJudge er h C. Sp ge Josep Jud R NIA ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?