Burke et al v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 157

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING AS MOOT 124 Motion for Attorney Fees; DENYING AS MOOT 128 Motion to Stay (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2010) Modified on 3/18/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID BURKE, et al., 7 8 vs. Plaintiffs, Case No: C 06-4533 SBA ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

9 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 15, 2010 ____________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge On January 10, 2008, the Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment, in part, and denied Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment for Defendants accordingly. Defendants filed a Motion for Attorneys' Fees and a Bill of Costs, which Plaintiffs moved to stay pending the Ninth Circuit's consideration of the appeal. The Ninth Circuit has since issued its mandate which reverses the Court's ruling in part and vacates the judgment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Docket 124) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay (Docket 128) are DENIED AS MOOT. This Order terminates Docket Nos. 124 and 128. IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants.