Paralyzed Veterans of America et al v. McPherson et al

Filing 210

STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the date for filing the Supplemental Complaint be extended to 10/20/08. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/30/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008) Modified on 10/1/2008 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 John E. McDermott (SBN 51047) Sharla Manley (SBN 240026) 2 HOWREY LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 3 Los Angeles, California 90071 4 Telephone: (213) 892-1800 Facsimile: (213) 892-2300 5 McDermottJ@howrey.com ManleyS@howrey.com 6 Benjamin K. Riley (SBN 112007) 7 HOWREY LLP 8 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco, California 94105 9 Telephone: (415) 848-4000 Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 10 RileyB@howrey.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA, et al., 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 HOWREY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) BRUCE MCPHERSON, as Secretary of State for ) the State of California, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. C 06 4670 SBA The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT Action filed: August 1, 2006 28 Case No. 06-4670 - SBA - JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT DM_US:21495757_1 1 DENNIS J. HERRERA (SBN 1396690) 2 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS (SBN 148137) 3 Deputy City Attorney 4 City and County of San Francisco Room 234, City Hall 5 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 6 Telephone: (415) 554-4675 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 7 Email: wayne.snodgrass@sfgov.org 8 Attorneys for Defendant, John Arntz, 9 As Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 HOWREY LLP 28 Case No. 06-4670 - SBA - JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT DM_US:21495757_1 1 Plaintiffs and Defendant John Arntz, Director of Elections for the City and County of San 2 Francisco present this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time to File a Supplemental 3 Complaint regarding assistive devices: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 HOWREY LLP RECITALS 1. Whereas the Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' Motion to File a Supplemental Complaint to assert an assistive device claim against defendant Arntz; 2. 2008; 3. Whereas plaintiffs and defendant Arntz are discussing a settlement proposal that would Whereas plaintiffs are required to file the Supplemental Complaint by September 29, make a Supplemental Complaint unnecessary; STIPULATION 1. Plaintiffs and defendant Arntz therefore agree to extend the date for filing the Supplemental Complaint to October 20, 2008. Dated: September 24, 2008 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ John E. McDermott John E. McDermott Sharla Manley HOWREY LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 1 Case No. 06-4670 - SBA - JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT DM_US:21495757_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 HOWREY LLP Dated: September 24, 2008 By: /s/ Wayne Snodgrass Wayne Snodgrass Dennis J. Herrera City's Attorney Office City and County of San Francisco Room 234, City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 Attorneys for Defendant John Arntz, As Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/30/08 _________________________________ The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Court Judge District of Northern California Presented by: /s/John E. McDermott John E. McDermott Howrey, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 -2Case No. 06-4670- SBA - JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT DM_US:21495757_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?